FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Limitation of actions

19 U.S.C. § 1621
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIII
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartV

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1621 (Limitation of actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1621.

Text

No suit or action to recover any duty under section 1592(d), 1593a(d) of this title, or any pecuniary penalty or forfeiture of property accruing under the customs laws shall be instituted unless such suit or action is commenced within five years after the time when the alleged offense was discovered, or in the case of forfeiture, within 2 years after the time when the involvement of the property in the alleged offense was discovered, whichever was later; except that—

(1)in the case of an alleged violation of section 1592 or 1593a of this title, no suit or action (including a suit or action for restoration of lawful duties under subsection (d) of such sections) may be instituted unless commenced within 5 years after the date of the alleged violation or, if such violation arises out of frau

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property
510 U.S. 43 (Supreme Court, 1993)
1,117 case citations
Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.
537 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 2003)
409 case citations
United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.
758 F.2d 741 (First Circuit, 1985)
229 case citations
United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre
264 F.3d 1195 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
128 case citations
Alberto Boero v. Drug Enforcement Administration
111 F.3d 301 (Second Circuit, 1997)
67 case citations
Hakeem O. Alli-Balogun v. United States
281 F.3d 362 (Second Circuit, 2002)
28 case citations
Eduardo Mantilla v. United States of America U.S. Customs Service
302 F.3d 182 (Third Circuit, 2002)
27 case citations
United States v. 6 Fox Street
480 F.3d 38 (First Circuit, 2007)
25 case citations
United States v. Ford Motor Co.
497 F.3d 1331 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
20 case citations
United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave., Rumson, Nj
738 F. Supp. 854 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
15 case citations
United States v. Claude Louis Duboc
694 F.3d 1223 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
12 case citations
United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.
383 F.3d 1319 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
12 case citations
United States v. Lazarenko
575 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (N.D. California, 2008)
4 case citations
Santana v. United States Customs Service
972 F. Supp. 304 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
3 case citations
United States v. Inocente Capote
159 F. App'x 108 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §621, 46 Stat. 758; Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title III, §306, 49 Stat. 527; Pub. L. 95–410, title I, §110(e), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 897; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §668, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2216; Pub. L. 106–185, §11, Apr. 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 217.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §621, 42 Stat. 988. That section was superseded by section 621 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Provisions substantially similar to those in this section, except that the period of limitation was three years, were contained in act June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §22, 18 Stat. 190, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 989.

Amendments
2000—Pub. L. 106–185 inserted ", or in the case of forfeiture, within 2 years after the time when the involvement of the property in the alleged offense was discovered, whichever was later" after "within five years after the time when the alleged offense was discovered" in introductory provisions.
1993—Pub. L. 103–182 inserted "any duty under section 1592(d), 1593a(d) of this title, or" before "any pecuniary penalty" and substituted "discovered; except that—" along with pars. (1) and (2) for "discovered: Provided, That in the case of an alleged violation of section 1592 of this title arising out of gross negligence or negligence, such suit or action shall not be instituted more than five years after the date the alleged violation was committed: Provided further, That the time of the absence from the United States of the person subject to such penalty or forfeiture, or of any concealment or absence of the property, shall not be reckoned within this period of limitation."
1978—Pub. L. 95–410 prescribed for any suit or action for violation of section 1592 of this title arising out of gross negligence or negligence a five year limitation period following date of alleged violation.
1935—Act Aug. 5, 1935, substituted "the alleged offense was discovered" for "such penalty or forfeiture accrued".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–185 applicable to any forfeiture proceeding commenced on or after the date that is 120 days after Apr. 25, 2000, see section 21 of Pub. L. 106–185, set out as a note under section 1324 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 95–410 for alleged violation of section 1592 of this title arising out of gross negligence or negligence committed on or after Oct. 3, 1978, or before such date without commencement of proceedings except where barred by provisions of this section in effect prior to such date, see section 110(f)(2) of Pub. L. 95–410, set out as a note under section 1592 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1621.