FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Searches and seizures

19 U.S.C. § 1595
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIII
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartV

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1595 (Searches and seizures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1595.

Text

(a)Warrant
(1)If any officer or person authorized to make searches and seizures has probable cause to believe that—
(A)any merchandise upon which the duties have not been paid, or which has been otherwise brought into the United States unlawfully;
(B)any property which is subject to forfeiture under any provision of law enforced or administered by the United States Customs Service; or
(C)any document, container, wrapping, or other article which is evidence of a violation of section 1592 of this title involving fraud or of any other law enforced or administered by the United States Customs Service, is in any dwelling house, store, or other building or place, he may make application, under oath, to any justice of the peace, to any municipal, county, State, or Federal judge, or to any Fe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. New York Telephone Co.
434 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1977)
868 case citations
Melvin Corngold v. United States
367 F.2d 1 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
202 case citations
Jim Floyd v. United States
860 F.2d 999 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
86 case citations
United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury, Serial Number 237590
527 F.2d 1112 (First Circuit, 1975)
84 case citations
United States v. Ernest G.M. Rowland
464 F.3d 899 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
66 case citations
Jeffrey M. Scarabin v. Drug Enforcement Administration
966 F.2d 989 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
47 case citations
Ruby Nnadi v. Robert Richter, District Director, United States Customs Service
976 F.2d 682 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
35 case citations
United States v. Davis
648 F.3d 84 (Second Circuit, 2011)
35 case citations
United States v. Jose Mendoza-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Cano
262 F.3d 882 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
27 case citations
United States v. Henry A. Molt, Jr
589 F.2d 1247 (Third Circuit, 1978)
26 case citations
United States v. ONE 1970 BUICK RIVIERA, SER. NO. 949870H920701
374 F. Supp. 277 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
19 case citations
United States v. Pedro Miguel Cristancho-Puerto
475 F.2d 1025 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
16 case citations
United States v. $319,820.00 in United States Currency
620 F. Supp. 1474 (N.D. Georgia, 1985)
16 case citations
Farrell v. United States
9 Cl. Ct. 757 (Court of Claims, 1986)
12 case citations
United States v. Portrait of Wally
663 F. Supp. 2d 232 (S.D. New York, 2009)
11 case citations
John Bacall Imports, Ltd. v. United States
287 F. Supp. 916 (C.D. California, 1968)
9 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §595, 46 Stat. 752; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(y), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 290; Pub. L. 99–570, title III, §3122, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–87; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §595, 42 Stat. 983. That section was superseded by section 595 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Provisions somewhat similar to those in subsec. (a), but authorizing searches in the daytime only, with a further provision as to forfeitures, were contained in R.S. §3066, as amended by act Apr. 25, 1882, ch. 89, 22 Stat. 49. Provisions for searches of buildings on or near the boundary line, and for seizure and forfeiture of merchandise, and removal of the building, were contained in R.S. §3107. Provisions empowering persons, authorized to make searches and seizures, to enter into or upon lands, inclosures, and buildings, were contained in R.S. §3065. All of these sections were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §642, 42 Stat. 989.
R.S. §3091, authorized the issuance of a warrant, upon complaint and affidavit of fraud on the revenue, directing the marshal of the district to enter any place and seize books or papers relating to merchandise in respect to which the alleged fraud was committed, and produce them before the judge.
R.S. §3092, provided that no warrant for such seizure should be issued unless the complaint should set forth the character of the fraud alleged, its nature, the importations in respect to which it was committed, and the papers to be seized, and required the return of such warrant as other warrants are returned.
R.S. §3093, provided that books and papers so seized should be subject to the order of the judge, who should allow the examination of the same by the collector or any officer authorized by him, and authorized the retention by the judge of such books and papers as he might deem necessary.
The provisions of act July 18, 1866, §39, and of act Mar. 2, 1867, §2, which were incorporated into these three sections, were repealed by the Anti-Moiety Act of June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §1, 18 Stat. 186. These sections were repealed, therefore, by that act, it having effect as subsequent to the Revised Statutes, and as repealing any portion of the revision inconsistent therewith, by virtue of R.S. §5601.

Amendments
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–570 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "If any officer or person authorized to make searches and seizures shall have cause to suspect the presence in any dwelling house, store, or other building or place of any merchandise upon which the duties have not been paid, or which has been otherwise brought into the United States contrary to law, he may make application, under oath, to any justice of the peace, to any municipal, county, State, or Federal judge, or to any United States magistrate, and shall thereupon be entitled to a warrant to enter such dwelling house in the daytime only, or such store or other place at night or by day, and to search for and seize such merchandise: Provided, That if any such house, store, or other building, or place in which such merchandise shall be found, is upon or within ten feet of the boundary line between the United States and a foreign country, such portion thereof as is within the United States may forthwith be taken down or removed."
1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–271 struck out "collector of customs or other" before "officer or person".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Change of Name
"Magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in subsec. (a)(1) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1595.