FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 42
Making extortionate extensions of credit
18 U.S.C. § 892
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter42 — EXTORTIONATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 892 (Making extortionate extensions of credit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 892.
Text
(a)Whoever makes any extortionate extension of credit, or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b)In any prosecution under this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit in question, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate, but this subsection is nonexclusive and in no way limits the effect or applicability of subsection (a):
(1)The repayment of the extension of credit, or the performance of any promise given in consideration thereof, would be unenforceable, through civil judicial processes against the debtor
(A)in the jurisdiction within which the debtor, if a natural person, resided or
(B)in every jurisdiction withi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Calandra
414 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Willie H. Dennis
625 F.2d 782 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
747 F.2d 632 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gary Bowdach, Cross-Appellee
561 F.2d 1160 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. Matranga
801 F.2d 1543 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Thomas James Sinito
723 F.2d 1250 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole
541 F.2d 938 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Louis Charles King v. United States
576 F.2d 432 (Second Circuit, 1978)
United States v. James Martorano
557 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Roger Benton (87-5355) And, Marion D. Campbell (87-5361), Defendants
852 F.2d 1456 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Francis Curcio and Gus Curcio
694 F.2d 14 (Second Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Glenn Arthur McClintic Jr.
570 F.2d 685 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie Coco
481 F.2d 289 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Alphonse Persico
853 F.2d 134 (Second Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Richard Mari
526 F.2d 117 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie Coco v. United States
569 F.2d 367 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Dominic Santarelli
778 F.2d 609 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Francis Curcio, Gus Curcio, Dahill D'OnOfriO and Roberto Garcia
712 F.2d 1532 (Second Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Cunningham
201 F.3d 20 (First Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Samuel J. Annerino
495 F.2d 1159 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 90–321, title II, §202(a), May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 160; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/892.