FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 305
Classification and treatment of prisoners
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
The Federal penal and correctional institutions shall be so planned and limited in size as to facilitate the development of an integrated system which will assure the proper classification and segregation of Federal prisoners according to the nature of the offenses committed, the character and mental condition of the prisoners, and such other factors as should be considered in providing an individualized system of discipline, care, and treatment of the persons committed to such institutions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 U.S.C. § 4081 (Classification and treatment of prisoners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moody v. Daggett
429 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Albert Garza v. Harold G. Miller, Warden
688 F.2d 480 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Williams v. Ward
556 F.2d 1143 (Second Circuit, 1977)
Cohen v. United States
151 F.3d 1338 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
Walker v. Hughes
558 F.2d 1247 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Pugliese v. Nelson
617 F.2d 916 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Douglas Glynn Payton, Administrator of the Estate of Sheryl Lynn Payton, Deceased v. The United States of America
679 F.2d 475 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Auckland Holmes v. United States Board of Parole and United States Bureau of Prisons
541 F.2d 1243 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
Bernard Marchesani v. Sub Nom. Gary McCune Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
531 F.2d 459 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Rosenberg v. Meese
622 F. Supp. 1451 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Tim Kramer v. James E. Donald
286 F. App'x 674 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Nimrod T. Solomon v. Charles L. Benson, Warden
563 F.2d 339 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
Larry Eugene Watkins v. United States
564 F.2d 201 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Drayton v. McCall
584 F.2d 1208 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Smaldone v. United States
458 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Kansas, 1978)
Fernandez-Collado v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
644 F. Supp. 741 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
Albers v. Ralston
665 F.2d 812 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Moriani v. Hunter
462 F. Supp. 353 (S.D. New York, 1978)
United States v. Marco Alfonso Ramirez
556 F.2d 909 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Anthony v. Wilkinson
637 F.2d 1130 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 850.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §907 (May 27, 1930, ch. 339, §7, 46 Stat. 390).
Language of section is so changed as to make one policy for all institutions, thus clarifying the manifest intent of Congress.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §907 (May 27, 1930, ch. 339, §7, 46 Stat. 390).
Language of section is so changed as to make one policy for all institutions, thus clarifying the manifest intent of Congress.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.