FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 233

Jury trial for contempt in labor dispute cases

18 U.S.C. § 3692

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3692 (Jury trial for contempt in labor dispute cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3692.

Text

In all cases of contempt arising under the laws of the United States governing the issuance of injunctions or restraining orders in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the contempt shall have been committed. This section shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice nor to the misbehavior, misconduct, or disobedience of any officer of the court in respect to the writs, orders or process of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bloom v. Illinois
391 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1968)
1,163 case citations
Jones v. United States
527 U.S. 373 (Supreme Court, 1999)
980 case citations
Green v. United States
356 U.S. 165 (Supreme Court, 1958)
425 case citations
Muniz v. Hoffman
422 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1975)
320 case citations
Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of America
545 F.2d 1336 (Third Circuit, 1976)
185 case citations
Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor
830 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
147 case citations
Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat & Allied Food Workers
534 F.2d 735 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
52 case citations
United States v. Jose L. Martinez
686 F.2d 334 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
38 case citations
Richmond Black Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Richmond
548 F.2d 123 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
37 case citations
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. United States
411 F.2d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
36 case citations
Emery Air Freight Corp. v. Local Union 295
449 F.2d 586 (Second Circuit, 1971)
29 case citations
National Maritime Union v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.
737 F.2d 1395 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
20 case citations
Ray C. Ballantyne v. United States
237 F.2d 657 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
19 case citations
United States v. Jorge Torrez
869 F.3d 291 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
17 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 844.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on section 111 of Title 29, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Labor (Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §11, 47 Stat. 72).
The phrase "or the District of Columbia arising under the laws of the United States governing the issuance of injunctions or restraining orders in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute" was inserted and the reference to specific sections of the Norris-LaGuardia Act (sections 101–115 of Title 29, U.S.C., 1940 ed.) were eliminated.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Taft-Hartley Injunctions
Former section 111 of Title 29, Labor, upon which this section is based, as inapplicable to injunctions issued under the Taft-Hartley Act, see section 178 of Title 29.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3692.