FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 233
Jury trial of criminal contempts
18 U.S.C. § 3691
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter233 — CONTEMPTS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3691 (Jury trial of criminal contempts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3691.
Text
Whenever a contempt charged shall consist in willful disobedience of any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of any district court of the United States by doing or omitting any act or thing in violation thereof, and the act or thing done or omitted also constitutes a criminal offense under any Act of Congress, or under the laws of any state in which it was done or omitted, the accused, upon demand therefor, shall be entitled to trial by a jury, which shall conform as near as may be to the practice in other criminal cases.
This section shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice, nor to contempts committed in disobedience of any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command ent
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Green v. United States
356 U.S. 165 (Supreme Court, 1958)
United States v. Barnett
376 U.S. 681 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and H. E. Gilbert v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Company
380 F.2d 570 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Wilber N. Olander, William Dolman, Denne M. Harrington, Gary D. Rondeau, Gerald L. Minnich, Arthur Schruder, and Roy D. Wilson
584 F.2d 876 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Mirra
220 F. Supp. 361 (S.D. New York, 1963)
Richmond Black Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Richmond
548 F.2d 123 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
US Sprint Communications Co. v. Buscher
89 B.R. 154 (D. Kansas, 1988)
United States v. Irving North. Appeal of William D. Eyler, an Immunized Witness in the Case of United States v. North
621 F.2d 1255 (Third Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Frank De Simone
267 F.2d 741 (Second Circuit, 1959)
National Maritime Union v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.
737 F.2d 1395 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Shirley Rangolan
464 F.3d 321 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Ben H. Frank v. United States
384 F.2d 276 (Tenth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Bernadette Gedraitis, in 81-2653. Appeal of Helen Moore, 81-2654. Appeal of Florence Johnson, 81-2655
690 F.2d 351 (Third Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Kimsey
668 F.3d 691 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Pyle
518 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
In Re Union Nacional De Trabajadores
502 F.2d 113 (First Circuit, 1974)
Pollard v. Panora
411 F. Supp. 580 (D. Massachusetts, 1976)
United States v. Thompson
117 F. Supp. 685 (S.D. New York, 1953)
United States v. Wright
516 F. Supp. 1113 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 844.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on sections 386, 389 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §§21, 24, 38 Stat. 738, 739).
The first paragraph of this section is completely rewritten from section 386 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, omitting everything covered and superseded by rules 23 and 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The second paragraph of this section is derived from section 389 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, omitting directions as to the trial of other contempts which are now covered by rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Based on sections 386, 389 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §§21, 24, 38 Stat. 738, 739).
The first paragraph of this section is completely rewritten from section 386 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, omitting everything covered and superseded by rules 23 and 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The second paragraph of this section is derived from section 389 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, omitting directions as to the trial of other contempts which are now covered by rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3691.