FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 223
Rights of victims to attend and observe trial
18 U.S.C. § 3510
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter223 — WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3510 (Rights of victims to attend and observe trial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3510.
Text
(a)Non-Capital Cases.—Notwithstanding any statute, rule, or other provision of law, a United States district court shall not order any victim of an offense excluded from the trial of a defendant accused of that offense because such victim may, during the sentencing hearing, make a statement or present any information in relation to the sentence.
(b)Capital Cases.—Notwithstanding any statute, rule, or other provision of law, a United States district court shall not order any victim of an offense excluded from the trial of a defendant accused of that offense because such victim may, during the sentencing hearing, testify as to the effect of the offense on the victim and the victim's family or as to any other factor for which notice is required under section 3593(a).
(c)Definition.—As used
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Gary Lee Sampson
486 F.3d 13 (First Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Daryl Lawrence
735 F.3d 385 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Visinaiz
428 F.3d 1300 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. William Cordova
806 F.3d 1085 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Johnson
362 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (N.D. Iowa, 2005)
United States v. Turner
367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D. New York, 2005)
United States v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co.
612 F. Supp. 2d 453 (D. New Jersey, 2009)
United States v. Spann
51 M.J. 89 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
United States v. Spann
48 M.J. 586 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)
United States v. Serawop
303 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Utah, 2004)
United States v. Sampson
(First Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Langston
50 M.J. 514 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 1999)
United States v. McVeigh
958 F. Supp. 512 (D. Colorado, 1997)
Kowal v. United States Department of Justice
(District of Columbia, 2021)
United States v. Cerritos
180 F. Supp. 3d 432 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)
United States v. Roof
225 F. Supp. 3d 406 (D. South Carolina, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 105–6, §2(a), Mar. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 12.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 503(e)(2) of the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to section 20141(e)(2) of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 105–6, §2(d), Mar. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 13, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending section 3593 of this title] shall apply in cases pending on the date of the enactment of this Act [Mar. 19, 1997]."
References in Text
Section 503(e)(2) of the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to section 20141(e)(2) of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 105–6, §2(d), Mar. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 13, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending section 3593 of this title] shall apply in cases pending on the date of the enactment of this Act [Mar. 19, 1997]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3510.