FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Human trafficking defense

18 U.S.C. § 28
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 28 (Human trafficking defense) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 28.

Text

(a)Definitions.—In this section—
(1)the term "covered Federal offense" means a level A offense or level B offense, as those terms are defined in section 3771A; and
(2)the term "victim of trafficking" has the meaning given the term in section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102).
(b)Duress.—In a prosecution for a covered Federal offense, a defendant may establish duress by demonstrating that the defendant was a victim of trafficking at the time at which the defendant committed the offense.
(c)Record or Proceeding Under Seal.—In any proceeding in which a defense under subsection (b) is raised, any record or part of the proceeding related to the defense shall, on motion, be placed under seal until such time as a conviction is entered for the offense.
(d)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffin v. Reichard
143 F.2d 443 (Sixth Circuit, 1944)
154 case citations
United States v. Ute Jarlik Bell
585 F. App'x 552 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
2 case citations
(PC) Bealer v. Newsom
(E.D. California, 2025)
(HC) Swopes v. Ciolli
(E.D. California, 2021)
(PC) Harris v. Robles
(E.D. California, 2021)
Ramil v. Beckhelm
(S.D. California, 2022)
Fierro v. United States
(D. Nevada, 2020)
United States v. CB Surety LLC
(E.D. California, 2024)
Cole v. United States
(D. Nevada, 2023)
Cotterman v. United States
(D. Arizona, 2022)
United States v. Thrower
(Second Circuit, 2009)
Hassan v. Gutierrez
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Lemus v. Garrett
(D. Nevada, 2022)
(HC) Plaza-Uzeta v. Taylor
(E.D. California, 2024)
Hernandez v. United States
(S.D. California, 2024)
(HC) Rivera v. Doerer
(E.D. California, 2025)
United States v. Pruitt
(Second Circuit, 2016)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 119–73, §6(a), Jan. 23, 2026, 139 Stat. 2009.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Rule of Construction
Pub. L. 119–73, §8, Jan. 23, 2026, 139 Stat. 2010, provided that: "Nothing in this Act [see Short Title of 2026 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title], or the amendments made by this Act, may be construed to conflict with any of the crime victims' rights described in section 3771 of title 18, United States Code."

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2018—Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §§382(b), 384(b), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3320, 3323, added items 39B and 40A.
2012—Pub. L. 112–95, title III, §311(b), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 66, transferred item 39 to appear after item 38 and added item 39A.
2008—Pub. L. 110–244, title III, §301(j), June 6, 2008, 122 Stat. 1616, redesignated item 39 "Commercial motor vehicles required to stop for inspections" as item 40.
2005—Pub. L. 109–59, title II, §2018(b), title IV, §4143(c)(1), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1543, 1748, added item 39 "Commercial motor vehicles required to stop for inspections" and item 39 "Traffic signal preemption transmitters".
2000—Pub. L. 106–181, title V, §506(c)(2)(A), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 139, added item 38.
1994—Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §§60008(c), 60021(b), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1972, 1980, added items 36 and 37.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/28.