FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 121

Civil action

18 U.S.C. § 2707
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter121 — STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2707 (Civil action) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2707.

Text

(a)Cause of Action.—Except as provided in section 2703(e), any provider of electronic communication service, subscriber, or other person aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind may, in a civil action, recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate.
(b)Relief.—In a civil action under this section, appropriate relief includes—
(1)such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate;
(2)damages under subsection (c); and
(3)a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
(c)Damages.—The court may assess as damages in a civil action under this

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Chao
540 U.S. 614 (Supreme Court, 2004)
384 case citations
Beaven v. United States Department of Justice
622 F.3d 540 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
173 case citations
United States v. Bradley Joseph Steiger
318 F.3d 1039 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
132 case citations
PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Department
832 F. Supp. 808 (D. New Jersey, 1993)
60 case citations
Jewel v. National Security Agency
673 F.3d 902 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
55 case citations
Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe
170 P.3d 712 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
43 case citations
Flagg ex rel. Bond v. City of Detroit
252 F.R.D. 346 (E.D. Michigan, 2008)
38 case citations
In re Yahoo Mail Litigation
308 F.R.D. 577 (N.D. California, 2015)
35 case citations
Cousineau v. Microsoft Corp.
992 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (W.D. Washington, 2012)
18 case citations
Lasco Foods, Inc. v. Hssmc
600 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (E.D. Missouri, 2009)
8 case citations
Taylor v. United States
616 F. App'x 423 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
6 case citations
Vista Marketing, LLC v. Burkett
999 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (M.D. Florida, 2014)
4 case citations
Carter Page v. James Comey
137 F.4th 806 (D.C. Circuit, 2025)
3 case citations
United States v. Reginald Lonnel Cray
450 F. App'x 923 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
1 case citations
Keesee v. Johnson
(E.D. Arkansas, 2023)
TrustLabs, Inc. v. An
(N.D. California, 2024)
Thornton v. Thornton
(W.D. Arkansas, 2020)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 99–508, title II, §201[(a)], Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1866; amended Pub. L. 104–293, title VI, §601(c), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3469; Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §§223(b), title VIII, §815, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 293, 384; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(f)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813; Pub. L. 115–141, div. V, §104(2)(B), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1216.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2018—Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 115–141 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: "a good faith determination that section 2511(3) of this title permitted the conduct complained of;".
2002—Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 107–56, §815. See 2001 Amendment note below.
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–56, §223(b)(1), inserted ", other than the United States," after "person or entity".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–56, §223(b)(2), added subsec. (d) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (d). Text read as follows: "If a court determines that any agency or department of the United States has violated this chapter and the court finds that the circumstances surrounding the violation raise the question whether or not an officer or employee of the agency or department acted willfully or intentionally with respect to the violation, the agency or department concerned shall promptly initiate a proceeding to determine whether or not disciplinary action is warranted against the officer or employee."
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 107–56, §815, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, inserted "(including a request of a governmental entity under section 2703(f) of this title)" after "or a statutory authorization".
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 107–56, §223(b)(3), added subsec. (g).
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–293, §601(c)(1), substituted "other person" for "customer".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–293, §601(c)(2), inserted at end "If the violation is willful or intentional, the court may assess punitive damages. In the case of a successful action to enforce liability under this section, the court may assess the costs of the action, together with reasonable attorney fees determined by the court."
Subsecs. (d) to (f). Pub. L. 104–293, §601(c)(3), (4), added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsecs. (d) and (e) as (e) and (f), respectively.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(f)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813, provided that the amendment made by section 4005(f)(2) is effective Oct. 26, 2001.

Effective Date
Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in the case of conduct pursuant to a court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders or extensions made after such effective date, see section 202 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2701 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2707.