FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 119
Repealed. Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §227(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 930
18 U.S.C. § 2514
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter119 — WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Current throughPub. L. 119-99
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2514 (Repealed. Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §227(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 930) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2514.
Text
Repealed. Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §227(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 930
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Calandra
414 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Gelbard v. United States
408 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States
466 F.2d 1059 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
In Re Robert Reginald Kilgo
484 F.2d 1215 (Fourth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James Bernard Singleton
460 F.2d 1148 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Russell Weiss
599 F.2d 730 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Thomas George
444 F.2d 310 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
In the Matter of the Grand Jury and Susan Marie Parker
411 F.2d 1067 (Tenth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. DiMuro
540 F.2d 503 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
In Re Grand Jury Investigation, Philip Charles Testa, Witness. Appeal of Philip Charles Testa
486 F.2d 1013 (Third Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Karen Duncan
456 F.2d 1401 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
State v. Vinegra
376 A.2d 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
In Re Carol Vericker
446 F.2d 244 (Second Circuit, 1971)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, George Gordon Liddy
506 F.2d 1293 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
In the Matter of Grand Jury Witness, Anthony Russo, Jr. Anthony Russo, Jr. v. United States
448 F.2d 369 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
In re Russo
53 F.R.D. 564 (C.D. California, 1971)
United States v. John Doe (Two Cases). Appeal of Marilyn Alperen. Appeal of Robert Alperen
478 F.2d 194 (First Circuit, 1973)
In Re December 1968 Grand Jury John Di Domenico, Witness-Appellant v. United States
420 F.2d 1201 (Seventh Circuit, 1970)
United States v. John P. Calandra
465 F.2d 1218 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
State v. Kenny
342 A.2d 189 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
Editorial Notes
Section, Pub. L. 90–351, title II, §802, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 216, provided for immunity of witnesses giving testimony or producing evidence under compulsion in Federal grand jury or court proceedings. Subject matter is covered in sections 6002 and 6003 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of Repeal
Sections 227(a) and 260 of Pub. L. 91–452 provided for repeal of this section effective four years following sixtieth day after date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–452, which was approved Oct. 15, 1970, such repeal not affecting any immunity to which any individual was entitled under this section by reason of any testimony or other information given before such date. See section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of Repeal
Sections 227(a) and 260 of Pub. L. 91–452 provided for repeal of this section effective four years following sixtieth day after date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–452, which was approved Oct. 15, 1970, such repeal not affecting any immunity to which any individual was entitled under this section by reason of any testimony or other information given before such date. See section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2514.