FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 113A
Enhanced penalties
18 U.S.C. § 2326
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter113A — TELEMARKETING AND EMAIL MARKETING FRAUD
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2326 (Enhanced penalties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2326.
Text
A person who is convicted of an offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1344, or 1347 or section 1128B of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b), or a conspiracy to commit such an offense, in connection with the conduct of telemarketing or email marketing—
(1)shall be imprisoned for a term of up to 5 years in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed under any of those sections, respectively; and
(2)in the case of an offense under any of those sections that—
(A)victimized ten or more persons over the age of 55; or
(B)targeted persons over the age of 55,
shall be imprisoned for a term of up to 10 years in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed under any of those sections, respectively.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Robert Louis Syrax, AKA Bob Johnson, AKA Robert L. Syrax
235 F.3d 422 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Serges Jacques Descent
292 F.3d 703 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Terrance D. Brown
147 F.3d 477 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Smith
133 F.3d 737 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. John Wesley Scrivener
189 F.3d 944 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Michael Davis (96-5895) and Miles Jones (96-5905)
170 F.3d 617 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Johnson
297 F.3d 845 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Charles Lowell Kentz
251 F.3d 835 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. George A. Coe, Jr., Jeffrey "j.j." Thomas, and David T. Beasley
220 F.3d 573 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
United States v. James Donald Robinson, Jr.
152 F.3d 507 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Raymond William Curly
167 F.3d 316 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Warren
986 F.3d 557 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. White
118 F.3d 739 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Wineman
60 F. App'x 73 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Rojay Lawson
(Fourth Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Tomey
222 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (N.D. Florida, 2016)
United States v. Damone Oakley
(Third Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Donald Dodt
(Fourth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Christopher Griffin
(Fourth Circuit, 2020)
Smith v. United States
(W.D. North Carolina, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXV, §250002(a)(2), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2082; amended Pub. L. 105–184, §§3, 4, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 520; Pub. L. 115–70, title IV, §402(a)(3), Oct. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1214.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2017—Pub. L. 115–70 substituted "1344, or 1347 or section 1128B of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b)" for "or 1344" and inserted "or email marketing" after "telemarketing" in introductory provisions.
1998—Pub. L. 105–184 inserted ", or a conspiracy to commit such an offense," after "or 1344" in introductory provisions and substituted "shall" for "may" in two places.
Amendments
2017—Pub. L. 115–70 substituted "1344, or 1347 or section 1128B of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b)" for "or 1344" and inserted "or email marketing" after "telemarketing" in introductory provisions.
1998—Pub. L. 105–184 inserted ", or a conspiracy to commit such an offense," after "or 1344" in introductory provisions and substituted "shall" for "may" in two places.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2326.