FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 88
Video voyeurism
18 U.S.C. § 1801
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter88 — PRIVACY
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1801 (Video voyeurism) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1801.
Text
(a)Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(b)In this section—
(1)the term "capture", with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast;
(2)the term "broadcast" means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons;
(3)the term "a private area of the individual" means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual;
(4)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.
164 A.3d 1189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security
653 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Charles Hillie
39 F.4th 674 (D.C. Circuit, 2021)
State v. Breedlove
213 So. 3d 1195 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
United States v. Johnson
719 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (W.D. Missouri, 2010)
United States v. Jaensch
678 F. Supp. 2d 421 (E.D. Virginia, 2010)
FRONTIER FISHING CROP. v. Evans
429 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Massachusetts, 2006)
Hamilton-Warwick v. Volkswagen Group of America
(D. Minnesota, 2018)
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Torsilieri, G.
(Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020)
United States v. Dodge
566 F.3d 976 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
COLEMAN (SOLOMON) VS. STATE
2018 NV 28 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2018)
Parker v. Michigan Department of Corrections State Prison
(E.D. Michigan, 2025)
Richard Bernard Gray v. Johnathan Martin, Joanne Martin, Mary Gonzalez, Ruvya Kahr, Roxanne Miranda, and Ray
(E.D. California, 2025)
United States v. Lenen Enrique Pacheco Colon
(Eleventh Circuit, 2025)
Taylor v. Higashi
(D. Hawaii, 2024)
United States v. Rocmon Sanders
(Third Circuit, 2023)
Richard Bernard Gray v. Johnathan Martin, et al.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Sammy Tawakkol v. Sheila Vasquez, in Her Official Capacity as Manager of the Texas Department of Public Safety- Sex Offender Registration Bureau; And Freeman F. Martin, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety
(Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025)
United States v. Private E2 NICHOLAS E. DAVIS
(Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2018)
Carlo Cerome v. Moshannon Valley Corr Ctr/Corn
(Third Circuit, 2010)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 108–495, §2(a), Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3999.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title of 2004 Amendment
Pub. L. 108–495, §1, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3999, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004'."
Short Title of 2004 Amendment
Pub. L. 108–495, §1, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3999, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004'."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1801.