FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 83

Theft of property used by Postal Service

18 U.S.C. § 1707
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter83 — POSTAL SERVICE

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1707 (Theft of property used by Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1707.

Text

Whoever steals, purloins, or embezzles any property used by the Postal Service, or appropriates any such property to his own or any other than its proper use, or conveys away any such property to the hindrance or detriment of the public service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; but if the value of such property does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Charles L. Starr, Jr., and Charles L. Starr, III
816 F.2d 94 (Second Circuit, 1987)
139 case citations
United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.
517 F.2d 953 (Second Circuit, 1975)
100 case citations
United States v. Webber
536 F.3d 584 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
77 case citations
Laymon Wesley Alsbury v. The United States Postal Service
530 F.2d 852 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
51 case citations
United States v. Algee
599 F.3d 506 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
49 case citations
State v. Walls
503 P.2d 1068 (Washington Supreme Court, 1972)
34 case citations
United States v. John Louis Crane
445 F.2d 509 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
28 case citations
Luther M. O'Brien v. United States
411 F.2d 522 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
28 case citations
United States v. Cruz Santiago
12 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 1993)
26 case citations
John Culberson Smith v. United States
505 F.2d 893 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
26 case citations
Albert Lonzo Cantrell v. United States
413 F.2d 629 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
22 case citations
Bernard Young Smith v. United States
312 F.2d 119 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
19 case citations
United States v. Derek Edward Benedict
95 F.3d 17 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
19 case citations
Melvin Joseph Conerly v. United States
350 F.2d 679 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
15 case citations
United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc.
725 F. Supp. 587 (District of Columbia, 1989)
12 case citations
Ex Parte Sheply
202 P.2d 882 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1949)
10 case citations
United States v. Ronnie Trammel
813 F.2d 946 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
6 case citations
United States v. Turley
141 F. Supp. 527 (D. Maryland, 1956)
6 case citations
United States v. Leeman
287 F. Supp. 279 (D. Nebraska, 1967)
5 case citations
United States v. Bobby H. Pursley
431 F.2d 961 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 779; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(18), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), (H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §313 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §190, 35 Stat. 1124).
The phrase "used by" was substituted for "in use by or belonging to" in order to limit the application of the section to property used by the Post Office Department. Theft of public property belonging to governmental departments is covered by section 641 of this title.
A fine of "$1,000" was substituted for "$200," thus increasing the maximum to conform with other comparable sections. (See section 1705 of this title.)
The smaller penalty for an offense involving property valued at $100 or less was added. (See reviser's notes under sections 641 and 645 of this title.)
Minor changes in phraseology were made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" after "service, shall be" and for "fined not more than $500" after "he shall be".
1970—Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "Postal Service" for "Post Office Department".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1707.