FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 83
Obstruction of correspondence
18 U.S.C. § 1702
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter83 — POSTAL SERVICE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1702 (Obstruction of correspondence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1702.
Text
Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Ramsey
431 U.S. 606 (Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Otero
563 F.3d 1127 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Dicario
8 C.M.A. 353 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Willie L. Wade
364 F.2d 931 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Lozano
623 F.3d 1055 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lorenzen
6 C.M.A. 512 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
United States v. Randall
287 F.3d 27 (First Circuit, 2002)
Darrel Paul Giraud v. United States
348 F.2d 820 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
United States v. Thurman
10 C.M.A. 377 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
Johnson v. Champions
990 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (S.D. Alabama, 2014)
United States v. Peoples
7 C.M.A. 534 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Manausa
12 C.M.A. 37 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
Miller v. Nichols
526 A.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Armstrong v. State
46 So. 3d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
United States v. Scioli
7 C.M.A. 502 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Robertson
40 F.3d 1046 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Johnson
9 C.M.A. 591 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Grieco
187 F. Supp. 597 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Biggs v. United States
318 F. Supp. 212 (N.D. Florida, 1970)
Carolyn Helen Tacoronte v. United States
323 F.2d 772 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §317 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §194, 35 Stat. 1125; Feb. 25, 1925, ch. 318, 43 Stat. 977; Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 693, 49 Stat. 867; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 557, 53 Stat. 1256).
Section 317 of said title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this and section 1708 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §317 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §194, 35 Stat. 1125; Feb. 25, 1925, ch. 318, 43 Stat. 977; Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 693, 49 Stat. 867; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 557, 53 Stat. 1256).
Section 317 of said title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this and section 1708 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1702.