FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 77
Mandatory restitution
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Notwithstanding section 3663 or 3663A, and in addition to any other civil or criminal penalties authorized by law, the court shall order restitution for any offense under this chapter.
(b)(1) The order of restitution under this section shall direct the defendant to pay the victim (through the appropriate court mechanism) the full amount of the victim's losses, as determined by the court under paragraph (3) of this subsection.
(3)As used in this subsection, the term "full amount of the victim's losses" has the same meaning as provided in section 2259(c)(2) and shall in addition include the greater of the gross income or value to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 U.S.C. § 1593 (Mandatory restitution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Sabhnani
599 F.3d 215 (Second Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Fu Sheng Kuo
620 F.3d 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Papagno
639 F.3d 1093 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Lipenga v. Kambalame
219 F. Supp. 3d 517 (D. Maryland, 2016)
United States v. Francis Guerra Pleitez
876 F.3d 150 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Roush
452 F. Supp. 2d 676 (N.D. Texas, 2006)
United States v. Pruitt
813 F.3d 90 (Second Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Richard Finkley (01-1646) and William Halliburton (01-1891)
324 F.3d 401 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Palmer
643 F.3d 1060 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Bobby Edwards
995 F.3d 342 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Chesire Martinez Robinson
508 F. App'x 867 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Tracie Dickey
52 F.4th 680 (Seventh Circuit, 2022)
Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC
(N.D. Georgia, 2024)
Ager v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
(S.D. Ohio, 2024)
Doe v. United States
(S.D. Florida, 2019)
United States v. Marvarlus Snead
(Fourth Circuit, 2022)
Fadlalla v. Dyncorp International LLC
(D. Maryland, 2019)
United States v. Williams
319 F. Supp. 3d 812 (E.D. Virginia, 2018)
United States v. Rendon-Reyes
(Second Circuit, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, §112(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1488; amended Pub. L. 110–457, title II, §221(1), Dec. 23, 2008, 122 Stat. 5067; Pub. L. 115–299, §3(c), Dec. 7, 2018, 132 Stat. 4385.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Fair Labor Standards Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), probably means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of Title 29 and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–299 substituted "section 2259(c)(2)" for "section 2259(b)(3)".
2008—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 110–457 added par. (4).
References in Text
The Fair Labor Standards Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), probably means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of Title 29 and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–299 substituted "section 2259(c)(2)" for "section 2259(b)(3)".
2008—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 110–457 added par. (4).