FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 63
Securities and commodities fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1348
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter63 — MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER FRAUD OFFENSES
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1348 (Securities and commodities fraud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1348.
Text
Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—
(1)to defraud any person in connection with any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)); or
(2)to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any money or property in connection with the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. John Robert Hasson, A.K.A. Heloneti Galera, A.K.A. Jack Hasson
333 F.3d 1264 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Leonard S. Siegel and Martin B. Abrams
717 F.2d 9 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Allen v. Administrative Review Bd.
514 F.3d 468 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Mahaffy
693 F.3d 113 (Second Circuit, 2012)
United States v. John Wesley Scrivener
189 F.3d 944 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Kernell
667 F.3d 746 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. John T. Renick
273 F.3d 1009 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Nina K. Rajwani
476 F.3d 243 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Roger Sanders v. Allison Engine Company, Inc.
703 F.3d 930 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Irvin
656 F.3d 1151 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Phillip Zweig
467 F.2d 1217 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Melvin
918 F.3d 1296 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
O'MAHONY v. Accenture Ltd.
537 F. Supp. 2d 506 (S.D. New York, 2008)
United States v. Blaszczak
56 F.4th 230 (Second Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Peter Armbruster
48 F.4th 527 (Seventh Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Nicely
492 F. App'x 119 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Abdallah
840 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. New York, 2012)
United States v. Taylor
60 F. App'x 429 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
HAUKE v. United States
(S.D. Indiana, 2020)
Ager v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
(S.D. Ohio, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title VIII, §807(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 804; amended Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1618.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2009—Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(A), inserted "and commodities" before "fraud" in section catchline.
Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(B), (C), inserted "any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or" before "any security".
Amendments
2009—Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(A), inserted "and commodities" before "fraud" in section catchline.
Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(B), (C), inserted "any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or" before "any security".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1348.