United States v. Taylor
This text of 54 F. App'x 176 (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Raymond Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no error. See United States v. Taylor, Nos. CR-99-368; CA-02-4 (E.D.Va. Aug. 3, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (2000), and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Taylor’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and we also deny his motion to have transcripts prepared at the Government’s expense because he has *177 failed to show the existence of a substantial question in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). See also Maloney v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 396 F.2d 939 (D.C.Cir.1967). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-ca4-2003.