United States v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2000·No. 99-6937·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6937

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERNEST TAYLOR, a/k/a Smoke,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-343-AW)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 10, 2000

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ernest Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) motion for return of prop-

erty. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-

soning of the district court. See United States v. Taylor, No. CR-

97-343-AW (D. Md. June 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.