United States v. Taylor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7772
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM MICHAEL TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-184)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Davis, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Taylor, No. CR-94-184 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.