United States v. Taylor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 F.3d 903
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 1996·No. 96-6860·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6860

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLINTON F. TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-58, CA-95-23-NN)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis McQuaid Lawrence, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottes- ville, Virginia, for Appellant. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Taylor, Nos. CR-91-58; CA-95-23-NN (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related