FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Interstate commerce and foreign commerce defined
18 U.S.C. § 10
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 10 (Interstate commerce and foreign commerce defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 10.
Text
The term "interstate commerce", as used in this title, includes commerce between one State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia and another State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia.
The term "foreign commerce", as used in this title, includes commerce with a foreign country.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dennis v. United States
341 U.S. 494 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Durham v. United States
214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Christopher B. Carroll
105 F.3d 740 (First Circuit, 1997)
McElroy v. United States
455 U.S. 642 (Supreme Court, 1982)
United States v. Paul Ajlouny
629 F.2d 830 (Second Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Vytautus Vebeliunas, Also Known as Vv
76 F.3d 1283 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Mary Elizabeth De La Rosa
911 F.2d 985 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Bary v. United States
248 F.2d 201 (Tenth Circuit, 1957)
United States v. Weingarten
632 F.3d 60 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Lipscomb v. United States
209 F.2d 831 (Eighth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Clifford McRary
665 F.2d 674 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Clarke
979 F.3d 82 (Second Circuit, 2020)
David Orion Griffin, Jr. v. Louis F. Mann, Superintendent
156 F.3d 288 (Second Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Wallace
937 F.3d 130 (Second Circuit, 2019)
Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States of America, Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States
237 F.2d 243 (Eighth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Charles Ronald McElroy
644 F.2d 274 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Savoca v. United States
21 F.4th 225 (Second Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Harold Martin Brest
266 F.2d 879 (Third Circuit, 1959)
United States v. Frankfeld
103 F. Supp. 48 (D. Maryland, 1952)
United States v. Edward Rosario Polanco
451 F.3d 308 (Third Circuit, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 686.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) (Oct. 29, 1919, ch. 89, §2(b), 41 Stat. 325; June 22, 1932, ch. 271, §2, 47 Stat. 326; May 18, 1934, ch. 301, 48 Stat. 782; May 22, 1934, ch. 333, §2(a), 48 Stat. 794; Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 366, §2(b), 55 Stat. 631).
This section consolidates into one section identical definitions contained in sections 408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
In addition to slight improvements in style, the word "commerce" was substituted for "transportation" in order to avoid the narrower connotation of the word "transportation" since "commerce" obviously includes more than "transportation." The word "Possession" was inserted in two places to make the definition more accurate and comprehensive since the places included in the word "Possession" would normally be within the term defined and a narrower construction should be handled by express statutory exclusion in those crimes which Congress intends to restrict to commerce within the continental United States.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) (Oct. 29, 1919, ch. 89, §2(b), 41 Stat. 325; June 22, 1932, ch. 271, §2, 47 Stat. 326; May 18, 1934, ch. 301, 48 Stat. 782; May 22, 1934, ch. 333, §2(a), 48 Stat. 794; Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 366, §2(b), 55 Stat. 631).
This section consolidates into one section identical definitions contained in sections 408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
In addition to slight improvements in style, the word "commerce" was substituted for "transportation" in order to avoid the narrower connotation of the word "transportation" since "commerce" obviously includes more than "transportation." The word "Possession" was inserted in two places to make the definition more accurate and comprehensive since the places included in the word "Possession" would normally be within the term defined and a narrower construction should be handled by express statutory exclusion in those crimes which Congress intends to restrict to commerce within the continental United States.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/10.