FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
Remedies for infringement: Impounding and disposition of infringing articles
17 U.S.C. § 503
Title17 — Copyrights
Chapter5 — COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND REMEDIES
This text of 17 U.S.C. § 503 (Remedies for infringement: Impounding and disposition of infringing articles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
17 U.S.C. § 503.
Text
(a)(1) At any time while an action under this title is pending, the court may order the impounding, on such terms as it may deem reasonable—
(A)of all copies or phonorecords claimed to have been made or used in violation of the exclusive right of the copyright owner;
(B)of all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies or phonorecords may be reproduced; and
(C)of records documenting the manufacture, sale, or receipt of things involved in any such violation, provided that any records seized under this subparagraph shall be taken into the custody of the court.
(2)For impoundments of records ordered under paragraph (1)(C), the court shall enter an appropriate protective order with respect to discovery and use of any records or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
960 F.2d 301 (Second Circuit, 1992)
First Technology Safety Systems, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Paul Depinet Steven Fuhr Barry Wade Vector Research, Inc.
11 F.3d 641 (First Circuit, 1993)
Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
166 F.3d 772 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Gamma Audio & Video, Inc. v. Ean-Chea D/B/A Overseas Video
11 F.3d 1106 (First Circuit, 1993)
Warner Bros. Inc., J. Joseph Bainton, Esquire v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc., and Yun Yon Cho
877 F.2d 1120 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Costello Publishing Co. v. John E. Rotelle, O. S. A. Costello Publishing Co., Inc. v. John E. Rotelle, O. S. A., Episcopal Conference of Australia
670 F.2d 1035 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
Vector Research, Inc. v. Howard & Howard Attorneys P.C.
76 F.3d 692 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
Virgin Records America, Inc. v. Lacey
510 F. Supp. 2d 588 (S.D. Alabama, 2007)
Hounddog Productions, L.L.C. v. Empire Film Group, Inc.
826 F. Supp. 2d 619 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Midway Manufacturing Company v. Omni Video Games, Inc., Ferncrest Distributors, Inc., Competitive Video, Inc., Chens International, Inc.
668 F.2d 70 (First Circuit, 1981)
Martin Luther King, Jr. Center for Social Change, Inc. v. American Heritage Products, Inc.
508 F. Supp. 854 (N.D. Georgia, 1981)
WPOW, Inc. v. MRLJ ENTERPRISES
584 F. Supp. 132 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Hung Tang v. Ho Yong Hwang
799 F. Supp. 499 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publishing Enterprises, Inc.
945 F.2d 509 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Film Ventures International, Inc.
543 F. Supp. 1134 (C.D. California, 1982)
Microsoft Corp. v. Computer Warehouse
83 F. Supp. 2d 256 (D. Puerto Rico, 2000)
Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
864 F. Supp. 2d 316 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Richard J. Zitz, Inc. v. Pereira
965 F. Supp. 350 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Autoskill, Inc. v. National Educational Support Systems Inc.
793 F. Supp. 1557 (D. New Mexico, 1992)
Pony Express Records, Inc. v. Springsteen
163 F. Supp. 2d 465 (D. New Jersey, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2585; Pub. L. 110–403, title I, §102(a), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4258; Pub. L. 111–295, §6(d), Dec. 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 3181.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
house report no. 94–1476
The two subsections of section 503 deal respectively with the courts' power to impound allegedly infringing articles during the time an action is pending, and to order the destruction or other disposition of articles found to be infringing. In both cases the articles affected include "all copies or phonorecords" which are claimed or found "to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights," and also "all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies of phonorecords may be reproduced." The alternative phrase "made or used" in both subsections enables a court to deal as it sees fit with articles which, though reproduced and acquired lawfully, have been used for infringing purposes such as rentals, performances, and displays.
Articles may be impounded under subsection (a) "at any time while an action under this title is pending," thus permitting seizures of articles alleged to be infringing as soon as suit has been filed and without waiting for an injunction. The same subsection empowers the court to order impounding "on such terms as it may deem reasonable." The present Supreme Court rules with respect to seizure and impounding were issued even though there is no specific provision authorizing them in the copyright statute, and there appears no need for including a special provision on the point in the bill.
Under section 101(d) of the present statute [section 101(d) of former title 17], articles found to be infringing may be ordered to be delivered up for destruction. Section 503(b) of the bill would make this provision more flexible by giving the court discretion to order "destruction or other reasonable disposition" of the articles found to be infringing. Thus, as part of its final judgment or decree, the court could order the infringing articles sold, delivered to the plaintiff, or disposed of in some other way that would avoid needless waste and best serve the ends of justice.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Trademark Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), probably means the Trademark Act of 1946, act July 5, 1946, ch. 540, 60 Stat. 427, also popularly known as the Lanham Act, which is classified generally to chapter 22 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Section 32 of the Act is classified to section 1114 of Title 15. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1051 of Title 15 and Tables.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 111–295 substituted "copies or phonorecords" for "copies of phonorecords".
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–403 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "At any time while an action under this title is pending, the court may order the impounding, on such terms as it may deem reasonable, of all copies or phonorecords claimed to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, and of all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies or phonorecords may be reproduced."
house report no. 94–1476
The two subsections of section 503 deal respectively with the courts' power to impound allegedly infringing articles during the time an action is pending, and to order the destruction or other disposition of articles found to be infringing. In both cases the articles affected include "all copies or phonorecords" which are claimed or found "to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights," and also "all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies of phonorecords may be reproduced." The alternative phrase "made or used" in both subsections enables a court to deal as it sees fit with articles which, though reproduced and acquired lawfully, have been used for infringing purposes such as rentals, performances, and displays.
Articles may be impounded under subsection (a) "at any time while an action under this title is pending," thus permitting seizures of articles alleged to be infringing as soon as suit has been filed and without waiting for an injunction. The same subsection empowers the court to order impounding "on such terms as it may deem reasonable." The present Supreme Court rules with respect to seizure and impounding were issued even though there is no specific provision authorizing them in the copyright statute, and there appears no need for including a special provision on the point in the bill.
Under section 101(d) of the present statute [section 101(d) of former title 17], articles found to be infringing may be ordered to be delivered up for destruction. Section 503(b) of the bill would make this provision more flexible by giving the court discretion to order "destruction or other reasonable disposition" of the articles found to be infringing. Thus, as part of its final judgment or decree, the court could order the infringing articles sold, delivered to the plaintiff, or disposed of in some other way that would avoid needless waste and best serve the ends of justice.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Trademark Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), probably means the Trademark Act of 1946, act July 5, 1946, ch. 540, 60 Stat. 427, also popularly known as the Lanham Act, which is classified generally to chapter 22 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Section 32 of the Act is classified to section 1114 of Title 15. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1051 of Title 15 and Tables.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 111–295 substituted "copies or phonorecords" for "copies of phonorecords".
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–403 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "At any time while an action under this title is pending, the court may order the impounding, on such terms as it may deem reasonable, of all copies or phonorecords claimed to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, and of all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies or phonorecords may be reproduced."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 U.S.C. § 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/17/503.