FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Negotiated licenses for public performances by means of coin-operated phonorecord players
17 U.S.C. § 116
Title17 — Copyrights
Chapter1 — SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT
This text of 17 U.S.C. § 116 (Negotiated licenses for public performances by means of coin-operated phonorecord players) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
17 U.S.C. § 116.
Text
(a)Applicability of Section.—This section applies to any nondramatic musical work embodied in a phonorecord.
(b)Negotiated Licenses.—
(1)Authority for negotiations.—Any owners of copyright in works to which this section applies and any operators of coin-operated phonorecord players may negotiate and agree upon the terms and rates of royalty payments for the performance of such works and the proportionate division of fees paid among copyright owners, and may designate common agents to negotiate, agree to, pay, or receive such royalty payments.
(2)Chapter 8 proceeding.—Parties not subject to such a negotiation may have the terms and rates and the division of fees described in paragraph (1) determined in a proceeding in accordance with the provisions of chapter 8.
(c)License Agreements S
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
421 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.
386 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Lewis Orgel and the Michie Company v. Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., and Alfred D. Jahr
301 F.2d 119 (Second Circuit, 1962)
June Roth v. Ilene Pritikin, as of the Estate of Nathan Pritikin, and Patrick M. McGrady
787 F.2d 54 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Mills Music, Inc. v. State of Arizona and Arizona Coliseum and Exposition Center Board, a Body Politic Under and by Virtue of the State of Arizona
591 F.2d 1278 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Sandra Fulps v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee
715 F.2d 1088 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. Continental Record Company, Inc., and Remington Records, Inc.
222 F.2d 488 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Senta Maria Runge v. Joyce Lee and Joyce Eve Lee Cosmetics, Inc., a Corporation
441 F.2d 579 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Malrite T. v. Of New York v. Federal Communications Commission, United States of America
652 F.2d 1140 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Consuelo Stephanie Pye and Iris Lee Hammer v. James Mitchell, Arthur Mitchell and Cinema Seven, Inc.
574 F.2d 476 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Billy Rose, Ray Henderson and Mel Torshin, as of the Estate of Mort Dixon v. Bourne, Inc.
279 F.2d 79 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Maier Brewing Company, a Corp. v. The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Maier Brewing Company, a Corp. v. James Buchanan & Co., Ltd.
359 F.2d 156 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
Wihtol v. Crow
309 F.2d 777 (Eighth Circuit, 1962)
Alexander v. Irving Trust Company
132 F. Supp. 364 (S.D. New York, 1955)
H. M. Kolbe Co., Inc. v. Armgus Textile Company, Inc. And Happy Cottons, Inc.
315 F.2d 70 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industro Motive Corporation and Henry G. Michael
492 F.2d 1281 (Sixth Circuit, 1974)
Quinto v. Legal Times of Washington, Inc.
511 F. Supp. 579 (District of Columbia, 1981)
Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. 4636 S. Vermont Ave., Inc., a California Corporation Doing Business as Reed's Music Store
367 F.2d 236 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
Blendingwell Music, Inc. v. Moor-Law, Inc.
612 F. Supp. 474 (D. Delaware, 1985)
Best Medium Publishing Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. The National Insider, Inc., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant
385 F.2d 384 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–568, §4(a)(4), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2855, §116A; renumbered §116 and amended Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2309; Pub. L. 105–80, §5, Nov. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1531; Pub. L. 108–419, §5(e), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2365.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 116, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2562; Pub. L. 100–568, §4(b)(1), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2857, related to scope of exclusive rights in nondramatic musical works and compulsory licenses for public performances by means of coin-operated phonorecord players, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–198, §3(a), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2309.
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 108–419, §5(e)(1), amended heading and text of par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Parties not subject to such a negotiation may determine, by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of chapter 8, the terms and rates and the division of fees described in paragraph (1)."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–419, §5(e)(2), substituted "Determinations by Copyright Royalty Judges" for "Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel Determinations" in heading and "the Copyright Royalty Judges" for "a copyright arbitration royalty panel" in text.
1997—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 105–80, §5(1), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows:
"(2) Arbitration.—Parties to such a negotiation, within such time as may be specified by the Librarian of Congress by regulation, may determine the result of the negotiation by arbitration. Such arbitration shall be governed by the provisions of title 9, to the extent such title is not inconsistent with this section. The parties shall give notice to the Librarian of Congress of any determination reached by arbitration and any such determination shall, as between the parties to the arbitration, be dispositive of the issues to which it relates."
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 105–80, §5(2), added subsec. (d).
1993—Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(A), renumbered section 116A of this title as this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (C), redesignated subsec. (c) as (b), substituted "Librarian of Congress" for "Copyright Royalty Tribunal" in two places in par. (2), and struck out former subsec. (b) which related to limitation on exclusive right if licenses not negotiated.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (D), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c), in heading substituted "Arbitration Royalty Panel" for "Royalty Tribunal", and in text substituted "subsection (b)" for "subsection (c)" and "a copyright arbitration royalty panel" for "the Copyright Royalty Tribunal".
Subsecs. (d) to (g). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (E), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and struck out subsecs. (e) to (g) which provided, in subsec. (e), for a schedule for negotiation of licenses, in subsec. (f), for a suspension of various ratemaking activities by the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, and in subsec. (g), for transition provisions and retention of Copyright Royalty Tribunal jurisdiction.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2004 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 108–419 effective 6 months after Nov. 30, 2004, subject to transition provisions, see section 6 of Pub. L. 108–419, set out as an Effective Date; Transition Provisions note under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective Mar. 1, 1989, with any cause of action arising under this title before such date being governed by provisions as in effect when cause of action arose, see section 13 of Pub. L. 100–568, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 116, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2562; Pub. L. 100–568, §4(b)(1), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2857, related to scope of exclusive rights in nondramatic musical works and compulsory licenses for public performances by means of coin-operated phonorecord players, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–198, §3(a), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2309.
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 108–419, §5(e)(1), amended heading and text of par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Parties not subject to such a negotiation may determine, by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of chapter 8, the terms and rates and the division of fees described in paragraph (1)."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–419, §5(e)(2), substituted "Determinations by Copyright Royalty Judges" for "Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel Determinations" in heading and "the Copyright Royalty Judges" for "a copyright arbitration royalty panel" in text.
1997—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 105–80, §5(1), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows:
"(2) Arbitration.—Parties to such a negotiation, within such time as may be specified by the Librarian of Congress by regulation, may determine the result of the negotiation by arbitration. Such arbitration shall be governed by the provisions of title 9, to the extent such title is not inconsistent with this section. The parties shall give notice to the Librarian of Congress of any determination reached by arbitration and any such determination shall, as between the parties to the arbitration, be dispositive of the issues to which it relates."
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 105–80, §5(2), added subsec. (d).
1993—Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(A), renumbered section 116A of this title as this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (C), redesignated subsec. (c) as (b), substituted "Librarian of Congress" for "Copyright Royalty Tribunal" in two places in par. (2), and struck out former subsec. (b) which related to limitation on exclusive right if licenses not negotiated.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (D), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c), in heading substituted "Arbitration Royalty Panel" for "Royalty Tribunal", and in text substituted "subsection (b)" for "subsection (c)" and "a copyright arbitration royalty panel" for "the Copyright Royalty Tribunal".
Subsecs. (d) to (g). Pub. L. 103–198, §3(b)(1)(B), (E), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and struck out subsecs. (e) to (g) which provided, in subsec. (e), for a schedule for negotiation of licenses, in subsec. (f), for a suspension of various ratemaking activities by the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, and in subsec. (g), for transition provisions and retention of Copyright Royalty Tribunal jurisdiction.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2004 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 108–419 effective 6 months after Nov. 30, 2004, subject to transition provisions, see section 6 of Pub. L. 108–419, set out as an Effective Date; Transition Provisions note under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective Mar. 1, 1989, with any cause of action arising under this title before such date being governed by provisions as in effect when cause of action arose, see section 13 of Pub. L. 100–568, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 U.S.C. § 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/17/116.