FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties

16 U.S.C. § 825p
Title16Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

This text of 16 U.S.C. § 825p (Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 825p.

Text

The District Courts of the United States, and the United States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of this chapter or the rules, regulations, and orders thereunder, and of all suits in equity and actions at law brought to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder. Any criminal proceeding shall be brought in the district wherein any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred. Any suit or action to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder may be brought in any such district or in the district wherein the d

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.
341 U.S. 246 (Supreme Court, 1951)
606 case citations
California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.
375 F.3d 831 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
375 case citations
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning
578 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 2016)
195 case citations
Coal. for Competitive Elec., Dynergy Inc. v. Zibelman
906 F.3d 41 (Second Circuit, 2018)
71 case citations
City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.
488 F. Supp. 1258 (S.D. Florida, 1980)
52 case citations
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
767 F.3d 335 (Third Circuit, 2014)
46 case citations
Jose Rolando Escobar Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
813 F.2d 283 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
38 case citations
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
570 F.2d 123 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
28 case citations
DiLaura v. Power Authority
982 F.2d 73 (Second Circuit, 1992)
20 case citations
Raton Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
891 F.2d 323 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
15 case citations
Elec. Power Supply Ass'n v. Star
904 F.3d 518 (Seventh Circuit, 2018)
11 case citations
Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota, LLC
103 F. Supp. 3d 1000 (D. Minnesota, 2015)
7 case citations
New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. The Council of the City of New Orleans
850 F.2d 1069 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
5 case citations
Sherr v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
180 F. Supp. 3d 407 (D. South Carolina, 2016)
5 case citations
MUNICIPAL ELEC. UTIL. ASS'N OF NEW YORK v. Conable
577 F. Supp. 158 (District of Columbia, 1983)
4 case citations
Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power Authority of New York
758 F. Supp. 854 (W.D. New York, 1991)
4 case citations
People ex rel. Lockyer v. Transcanada Power L.P.
110 F. App'x 839 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
3 case citations
Pressl v. Appalachian Power Co.
137 F. Supp. 3d 900 (W.D. Virginia, 2015)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §317, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 862; amended June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(b), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
As originally enacted, this section contained reference to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Act June 25, 1936, substituted "the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia" for "the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia", and act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" for "district court of the United States for the District of Columbia". However, the words "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" have been deleted entirely as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district", and section 88 of Title 28 which states that "the District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".
"Sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28", referred to in text, were substituted for "sections 128 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (U.S.C. title 28, secs. 225 and 347)" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, the first section of which enacted Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 825p, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/825p.