FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

Enforcement provisions

16 U.S.C. § 825m
Title16Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

This text of 16 U.S.C. § 825m (Enforcement provisions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 825m.

Text

(a)Enjoining and restraining violations Whenever it shall appear to the Commission that any person is engaged or about to engage in any acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of the provisions of this chapter, or of any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, it may in its discretion bring an action in the proper District Court of the United States or the United States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to enjoin such acts or practices and to enforce compliance with this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, and upon a proper showing a permanent or temporary injunction or decree or restraining order shall be granted without bond. The Commission may transmit such evidence as may be available con

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sampson v. Murray
415 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1974)
1,851 case citations
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power Commission
379 F.2d 153 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
137 case citations
Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of Plano
584 F.2d 668 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
65 case citations
City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.
488 F. Supp. 1258 (S.D. Florida, 1980)
52 case citations
United States v. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
256 F.3d 36 (First Circuit, 2001)
23 case citations
Carolina Aluminum Co. v. Federal Power Commission
97 F.2d 435 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)
21 case citations
United States of America, in No. 82-1605 v. Fmc Corporation, in No. 82-1640
717 F.2d 775 (Third Circuit, 1983)
16 case citations
Federal Power Commission v. Arizona Edison Co., Inc
194 F.2d 679 (Ninth Circuit, 1952)
15 case citations
Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
181 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1950)
14 case citations
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
131 F.2d 148 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)
13 case citations
Portland General Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
854 F.3d 692 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
10 case citations
Coalition for Competitive Electricity, Dynegy Inc. v. Zibelman
272 F. Supp. 3d 554 (S.D. New York, 2017)
9 case citations
Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission
559 F.2d 1227 (Second Circuit, 1977)
8 case citations
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
162 F. Supp. 2d 107 (N.D. New York, 2001)
6 case citations
Wolverine Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
963 F.2d 446 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §314, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 861; amended June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(b), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1288, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 982.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
As originally enacted subsecs. (a) and (b) contained references to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Act June 25, 1936, substituted "the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia" for "the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia", and act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" for "district court of the United States for the District of Columbia". However, the words "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" have been deleted entirely as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district", and section 88 of Title 28 which states that "the District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".

Amendments
2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–58 added subsec. (d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 825m, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/825m.