FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Investigations by Commission
16 U.S.C. § 825f
Title16 — Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
This text of 16 U.S.C. § 825f (Investigations by Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 825f.
Text
(a)Scope
The Commission may investigate any facts, conditions, practices, or matters which it may find necessary or proper in order to determine whether any person, electric utility, transmitting utility, or other entity has violated or is about to violate any provision of this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, or to aid in the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter or in prescribing rules or regulations thereunder, or in obtaining information to serve as a basis for recommending further legislation concerning the matters to which this chapter relates, or in obtaining information about the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce and the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce. The Commission may permit any person, electric util
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.
341 U.S. 246 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Gelbard v. United States
408 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission
411 U.S. 747 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power Commission
379 F.2d 153 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland
315 U.S. 357 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
519 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1997)
Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. State
620 P.2d 182 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1980)
United States v. Southern California Edison Co.
300 F. Supp. 2d 964 (E.D. California, 2004)
United States v. Robert S. Friedrick
842 F.2d 382 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Cohen v. United States
201 F.2d 386 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Federal Maritime Commission v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company, Ltd.
335 F.2d 255 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Lowell Sun Co. v. Fleming
120 F.2d 213 (First Circuit, 1941)
Friends of the Cowlitz and Cpr-Fish, City of Tacoma, Ferc Project Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
253 F.3d 1161 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission
224 F. Supp. 166 (N.D. Indiana, 1963)
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Fleming
122 F.2d 1005 (Eighth Circuit, 1941)
Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
181 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1950)
The Coalition For Fair And Equitable Regulation Of Docks On Lake Of The Ozarks v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
297 F.3d 771 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
131 F.2d 148 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)
Porter v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.
156 F.2d 891 (Sixth Circuit, 1946)
Mondakota Gas Co. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
103 F. Supp. 666 (D. Montana, 1951)
Source Credit
History
(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §307, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 856; amended Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §221, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1284(b), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 980.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–58 inserted ", electric utility, transmitting utility, or other entity" after "person" in two places and inserted ", or in obtaining information about the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce and the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce" before period at end of first sentence.
1970—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 91–452 struck out subsec. (g) which related to the immunity from prosecution of any individual compelled to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, after claiming his privilege against self-incrimination.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on 60th day following Oct. 15, 1970, and not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before 60th day following Oct. 15, 1970, see section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–58 inserted ", electric utility, transmitting utility, or other entity" after "person" in two places and inserted ", or in obtaining information about the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce and the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce" before period at end of first sentence.
1970—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 91–452 struck out subsec. (g) which related to the immunity from prosecution of any individual compelled to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, after claiming his privilege against self-incrimination.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on 60th day following Oct. 15, 1970, and not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before 60th day following Oct. 15, 1970, see section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 825f, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/825f.