FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—DOMESTIC SECURITIES
Contrary stipulations void
15 U.S.C. § 77n
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—DOMESTIC SECURITIES
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 77n (Contrary stipulations void) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 77n.
Text
Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with any provision of this subchapter or of the rules and regulations of the Commission shall be void.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southland Corp. v. Keating
465 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
417 U.S. 506 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Wilko v. Swan
346 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1953)
Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLC
594 F.3d 383 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Haynsworth v. the Corporation
121 F.3d 956 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
414 U.S. 117 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. Hutcheson
674 F.2d 862 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.
418 F.2d 1276 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Kenneth F. Bonny, Francesca B. Bonny and Robert D. Flesvig v. The Society of Lloyd's
3 F.3d 156 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Arguelles
400 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Keating v. Superior Court
645 P.2d 1192 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.
80 F.R.D. 626 (N.D. California, 1978)
Percy D. AYRES, Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.
538 F.2d 532 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,126 Henry and Elaine Weissbuch v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
558 F.2d 831 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc., and John C. Greenhaw, Cross-Appellees v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Cross-Appellants
785 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Frederick J. Page, Jr. And Kristin D. Page v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc., and Joseph McDonald
806 F.2d 291 (First Circuit, 1986)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,244 Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & Neufeld
451 F.2d 838 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Can-Am Petroleum Co. v. Beck
331 F.2d 371 (Tenth Circuit, 1964)
Vaughan S. Newcome v. A. Jack Esrey Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc.
862 F.2d 1099 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
797 F.2d 1197 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Source Credit
History
(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §14, 48 Stat. 84.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 77n, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/77n.