FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 57

Regulation of interstate off-track wagering

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 15Commerce and Trade·Ch. 57 — INTERSTATE HORSERACING
(a)Consent of host racing association, host racing commission, and off-track racing commission as prerequisite to acceptance of wager An interstate off-track wager may be accepted by an off-track betting system only if consent is obtained from—
(1)the host racing association, except that—
(A)as a condition precedent to such consent, said racing association (except a not-for-profit racing association in a State where the distribution of off-track betting revenues in that State is set forth by law) must have a written agreement with the horsemen's group, under which said racing association may give such consent, setting forth the terms and conditions relating thereto; provided,
(B)that where the host racing association has a contract with a horsemen's group at the time of enactment of th

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

15 U.S.C. § 3004 (Regulation of interstate off-track wagering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Churchill Downs Inc. v. Thoroughbred Horsemen's Group, LLC
605 F. Supp. 2d 870 (W.D. Kentucky, 2009)
12 case citations
In Re New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.
434 B.R. 131 (S.D. New York, 2010)
10 case citations
Monarch Content Management LLC v. Arizona Department of Gaming
971 F.3d 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
8 case citations
New Suffolk Downs Corp. v. Rockingham Venture, Inc.
656 F. Supp. 1190 (D. New Hampshire, 1987)
6 case citations
Sterling Suffolk Racecourse Ltd. Partnership v. Burrillville Racing Ass'n
802 F. Supp. 662 (D. Rhode Island, 1992)
6 case citations
Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Tampa Bay Downs, Inc.
294 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (M.D. Florida, 2003)
4 case citations
Cloverleaf Enterprises, Inc. v. Maryland Thoroughbred, Horsemen's Ass'n
730 F. Supp. 2d 451 (D. Maryland, 2010)
3 case citations
(1997)
82 Op. Att'y Gen. 131 (Maryland Attorney General Reports, 1997)
(2001)
86 Op. Att'y Gen. 132 (Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2001)
Opinion No. (2002)
(Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 2002)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 95–515, §5, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1813.)