Opinion No. (2002)

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 16, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. (2002) (Opinion No. (2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. (2002), (Okla. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

Dear District Attorney Cherie Free:

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

1. May a district attorney institute an Alcohol/Drug ImpactPanel program under 47 O.S. 2001, § 11-902[47-11-902] (I), in which theDistrict Attorney's Office can charge the statutory fee, presentthe program, and pay for the speakers and the general cost of theprogram? 2. May a district attorney set up a separate account with theCounty Clerk's Office for the purposes of depositing the feesgenerated by the defendants paying to attend the Alcohol/DrugImpact Panel program and pay the general costs of that programfrom the separate account to include speakers' mileage, printingcosts, public announcements, and additional personnel costs? 3. If the separate account is allowed to be established, doesthe money generated by the program have to be forwarded to theDistrict Attorneys Council before the funds can be expended forthe general costs of the program?

I.
Introduction
¶ 1 You indicate you require as a condition of a plea agreement that any person convicted of either driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or of delivery of alcohol/beer to a minor must attend the Victims Impact Panel program established by 47 O.S. 2001, § 11-902[47-11-902](I). You also indicate that you wish to establish your own program. You want to know if that can be done; if so, whether you have authority to collect a fee for your program, which you indicate will be used to offset the expenses of your program.

¶ 2 Your question centers on 47 O.S. 2001, § 11-902[47-11-902]. That statute makes it illegal for persons to drive or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In addition to setting out penalties, Section 11-902(I) provides:

Any person who is found guilty of a violation of the provisions of this section may be required by the court to attend a victims impact panel program, if such a program is offered in the county where the judgment is rendered, and to pay a fee, not less than Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) nor more than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) as set by the governing authority of the program and approved by the court, to the program to offset the cost of participation by the defendant, if in the opinion of the court the defendant has the ability to pay such fee.

Id.

¶ 3 As the statute indicates, not every county may have such a program. The Victims Impact Panel is not an agency established by the State or a political subdivision. Rather, it is a private, self-supporting, non-profit organization which, through an executive director, administers approximately 38 programs throughout the State. The executive office, located in Oklahoma City, collects money from the individual programs, which it in turn uses to pay program coordinators and other necessities of the programs throughout the State. Those ordered to enroll in the program attend a one-time session, and the person ordered to attend the program presents proof of completion to the court. In addition to the programs administered through the Victims Impact Panel, there are also separate, independent programs of a similar nature administered in Norman and Claremore.

¶ 4 You have asked us whether a district attorney can establish a Victims Impact Panel program. For the reasons given below, the answer is no.

II.
Powers And Duties Of District Attorney
¶ 5 The office of district attorney finds its origin in the Oklahoma Constitution:

There are hereby created, subject to change by the Legislature, in and for each organized county of this State, the offices of Judge of the County Court, County Attorney, Clerk of the District Court, County Clerk, Sheriff, County Treasurer, Register of Deeds, County Surveyor, Superintendent of Public Instruction, three County Commissioners, and such municipal township officers as are now provided for under the laws of the Territory of Oklahoma, except as in this Constitution otherwise provided.

Okla. Const. art. XVII, § 2. The office of district attorney is the successor office to that of County Attorney. 19 O.S. 2001, § 215.16[19-215.16].1

¶ 6 The powers and duties of the County Attorney were discussed at length in Childs v. State, 113 P. 545, 547 (Okla.Crim.App. 1910). After quoting the above referenced constitutional provision, the Court stated:

By section 18 of the schedule to our Constitution, it is provided that, "until otherwise provided by law, the terms, duties, powers, qualifications, and salary and the compensation of all county and township officers not otherwise provided by this Constitution shall be as now provided by the laws of the territory of Oklahoma for like named officers. * * *" It will be seen from an examination of these two constitutional provisions that neither the office of county attorney nor the duties and powers pertaining thereto are imbedded in the Constitution. The office may be entirely abrogated, or the powers and duties pertaining to it enlarged or diminished or wholly or partially transferred to district or state officers, as the Legislature may see fit.

Id. (emphasis added).

¶ 7 That is not the only pronouncement by the Court of Criminal Appeals on the limitations on the district attorney's power. Seealso State v. Juvenile Div., Tulsa County Dist. Court,560 P.2d 974, 975 (Okla.Crim. 1977) ("[T]he powers and authority of the prosecuting attorney can be enlarged or diminished by the Legislature.").

¶ 8 Likewise, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has commented on powers granted to the office of district attorney. See Bd. ofCounty Comm'rs v. Morgan, 324 P.2d 268, 270 (Okla. 1958) (In a condemnation case the county attorney did not have authority to decide whether to appeal an adverse civil ruling; the decision was that of the board of county commissioners); Protest ofKansas City S. Ry. Co., 11 P.2d 500 (Okla. 1932) (syllabus by court) ("2. There is no authority of law for a county attorney to agree to the rendition of a judgment against a county."); Bd. ofEduc. v. Thurman, 247 P. 996, 999 (Okla. 1926) (discussing duties of the county attorney to defend against tax suits brought against the county treasurer, the Court observed that "[t]he Legislature defined the duties of the county attorney"); Bd. ofComm'rs v. Fain, 166 P. 896

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Juvenile Division, Tulsa County District Court
1977 OK CR 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1977)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v. Morgan
1958 OK 91 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Thurman
1926 OK 34 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Board of County Com'rs of Lincoln County v. Robertson
1913 OK 164 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Ironside v. State Ex Rel. Caldwell, Co. Atty.
1915 OK 184 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
1932 OK 328 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Board of Com'rs, Comanche Co. v. Fain
1917 OK 369 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Childs v. State
1910 OK CR 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)
Board of County Commissioners v. State Capital Co.
1906 OK 15 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. (2002), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-2002-oklaag-2002.