FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Employee protection
15 U.S.C. § 2622
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 2622 (Employee protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 2622.
Text
(a)In general
No employer may discharge any employee or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or any person acting pursuant to a request of the employee) has—
(1)commenced, caused to be commenced, or is about to commence or cause to be commenced a proceeding under this chapter;
(2)testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding; or
(3)assisted or participated or is about to assist or participate in any manner in such a proceeding or in any other action to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
(b)Remedy
(1)Any employee who believes that the employee has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by any person in violation of subsection (a) of this s
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
523 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority
535 U.S. 743 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Donald J. Willy, and George A. Young v. The Coastal Corp., Coastal States Management Co., Inc., Defendants
855 F.2d 1160 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.
795 S.W.2d 723 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Anderson v. United States Department of Labor
422 F.3d 1155 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
School District of the City of Allentown v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Edward Hanna
657 F.2d 16 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Patricia D. Deubert and Sonya M. Deroche v. Gulf Federal Savings Bank
820 F.2d 754 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
William Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc.
731 F.3d 901 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Willy v. Administrative Review Board
423 F.3d 483 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor and Robert Reich, the Secretary of Labor
992 F.2d 474 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Bert Williams v. Cynthia Metzler, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and Public Service Electric and Gas Company
132 F.3d 937 (Third Circuit, 1997)
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor
769 F.2d 37 (Second Circuit, 1985)
In Re Donald J. Willy
831 F.2d 545 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Collette v. St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital
132 F. Supp. 2d 256 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Swears v. R.M. Roach & Sons, Inc.
696 S.E.2d 1 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2010)
Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas Perez
745 F.3d 521 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)
Bobreski v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
284 F. Supp. 2d 67 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Barbara Pogue v. United States Department of Labor Lynn Martin, Secretary
940 F.2d 1287 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Neal v. HONEYWELL INC.
995 F. Supp. 889 (N.D. Illinois, 1998)
Kounelis v. Sherrer
396 F. Supp. 2d 525 (D. New Jersey, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 94–469, title I, §23, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2044; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(19), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 99–519, §3(c)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2989.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provision that civil actions brought under this subsection had to be heard and decided expeditiously.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1977, see section 31 of Pub. L. 94–469, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provision that civil actions brought under this subsection had to be heard and decided expeditiously.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1977, see section 31 of Pub. L. 94–469, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 2622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/2622.