FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs
15 U.S.C. § 26
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 26 (Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 26.
Text
Any person, firm, corporation, or association shall be entitled to sue for and have injunctive relief, in any court of the United States having jurisdiction over the parties, against threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws, including sections 13, 14, 18, and 19 of this title, when and under the same conditions and principles as injunctive relief against threatened conduct that will cause loss or damage is granted by courts of equity, under the rules governing such proceedings, and upon the execution of proper bond against damages for an injunction improvidently granted and a showing that the danger of irreparable loss or damage is immediate, a preliminary injunction may issue: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to entitle any person, firm, cor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.
602 F.3d 237 (Third Circuit, 2010)
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine
428 F.3d 408 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Radovich v. National Football League
352 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation
415 F.2d 55 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
Conwood Company, L.P. v. United States Tobacco Company
290 F.3d 768 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co.
31 F.3d 1041 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes
332 F.2d 602 (Second Circuit, 1964)
United States Football League v. National Football League
842 F.2d 1335 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Morgenstern v. Wilson
29 F.3d 1291 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Lucas Automotive Engineering, Inc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
140 F.3d 1228 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Moore v. Moore
2016 Ark. 105 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2016)
Yoder Brothers, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Crossappellants. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Crossappellants v. Yoder Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross
537 F.2d 1347 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Adams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
828 F.2d 24 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
State of Ariz. v. MARICOPA CTY. MEDICAL SOC.
578 F. Supp. 1262 (D. Arizona, 1984)
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.
86 F.R.D. 752 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
United States v. Federal Communications Commission
652 F.2d 72 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Cohn v. Bond
953 F.2d 154 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)
City of Fairfax v. Fairfax Hospital Association
562 F.2d 280 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
In re North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation
256 F. Supp. 3d 298 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Seattle Professional Photographers Ass'n v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
513 P.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)
Source Credit
History
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §16, 38 Stat. 737; Pub. L. 94–435, title III, §302(3), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1396; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §318(3), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 949.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Amendments
1995—Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under subtitle IV of title 49" for "in equity for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the provisions of the Act to regulate commerce, approved February fourth, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven, in respect of any matter subject to the regulation, supervision, or other jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission."
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 inserted provision authorizing court to award costs, including attorneys' fees, to a successful plaintiff.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Amendments
1995—Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under subtitle IV of title 49" for "in equity for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the provisions of the Act to regulate commerce, approved February fourth, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven, in respect of any matter subject to the regulation, supervision, or other jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission."
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 inserted provision authorizing court to award costs, including attorneys' fees, to a successful plaintiff.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/26.