FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Suits by United States; subpoenas for witnesses
15 U.S.C. § 23
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 23 (Suits by United States; subpoenas for witnesses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 23.
Text
In any suit, action, or proceeding brought by or on behalf of the United States subpoenas for witnesses who are required to attend a court of the United States in any judicial district in any case, civil or criminal, arising under the antitrust laws may run into any other district: Provided, That in civil cases no writ of subpoena shall issue for witnesses living out of the district in which the court is held at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of holding the same without the permission of the trial court being first had upon proper application and cause shown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ghandi v. Police Department of Detroit
74 F.R.D. 115 (E.D. Michigan, 1977)
Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. Lobach
919 A.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
United States v. General Motors Corporation
183 F. Supp. 858 (S.D. New York, 1960)
In Re Subpoenas Addressed to Fish & Neave and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts
519 F.2d 116 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Scott & Williams, Inc.
88 F. Supp. 531 (S.D. New York, 1950)
Amgen Inc. v. Kidney Center of Delaware County, Ltd.
879 F. Supp. 878 (N.D. Illinois, 1995)
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
71 F.R.D. 88 (S.D. New York, 1976)
King v. Douglass
973 F. Supp. 707 (S.D. Texas, 1996)
In Re General Motors Corp. Pickup Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation
846 F. Supp. 330 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
251 F.R.D. 213 (E.D. Louisiana, 2008)
In Re the Grand Jury Subpœna Duces Tecum Addressed to Electric & Musical Industries, Ltd.
155 F. Supp. 892 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
255 F.R.D. 556 (N.D. Alabama, 2009)
Katz Drug Co. v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.
6 F. Supp. 210 (W.D. Missouri, 1932)
United States v. First Data & Concord EFS, Inc.
287 F. Supp. 2d 69 (District of Columbia, 2003)
United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.
13 Ct. Int'l Trade 331 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dragonchain Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Aramic LLC v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Bravo Development Group, Inc. v. Trinity Medical, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2020)
Williams v. Vista
(E.D. California, 2022)
Facebook, Inc. v. Sahinturk
(N.D. California, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §13, 38 Stat. 736.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/23.