United States v. First Data & Concord EFS, Inc.

287 F. Supp. 2d 69, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23458, 2003 WL 22463057
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 31, 2003
DocketCIV.A.03-2169(RMC)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 287 F. Supp. 2d 69 (United States v. First Data & Concord EFS, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. First Data & Concord EFS, Inc., 287 F. Supp. 2d 69, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23458, 2003 WL 22463057 (D.D.C. 2003).

Opinion

SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

COLLYER, District Judge.

COUNSEL SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THIS ORDER AND NOTE ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS MADE TO THE PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES.

In accordance with Fed. R. Crv. P. 16, it is this 31st day of October, 2003, hereby ORDERED that:

I.SCHEDULE

1. Response to the Complaint. The United States having filed its Complaint on October 23, 2003, Defendants shall file their answers to the Complaint no later than October 31, 2003.

2. Discovery Period Excluding Expert Witness Discovery. The period for all fact discovery shall begin upon entry of this order and shall be completed by December 5, 2003. All discovery shall be served in a time frame that will permit timely responses, under this Order or pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by December 5, 2003.

3. Expert Witness Reports and Depositions. Each party shall serve initial expert report(s) in conformity with Fed. R. Crv. P. 26(a)(2) no later than November 19, 2003. Initial expert reports shall contain all opinions held by the expert as of November 19, 2003 but need be based only on information in the possession of the respective party(ies) on or before October *70 23, 2003. Each party shall serve supplemental and rebuttal expert report(s) on December 1, 2003. Supplemental expert report(s) shall be limited to information disclosed to the submitting side after October 23, 2003 and prior to November 24, 2003 and may also contradict or rebut evidence in an opposing side’s previously disclosed expert report(s). Unless otherwise agreed, depositions of the parties’ experts shall be conducted after the exchange of the above-referenced reports and shall be completed by December 11, 2003. The parties agree that communications with counsel, including draft expert reports, are not subject to discovery.

4. Exchange of Witness Lists. The parties shall exchange witness lists, compiled in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(A), no later than November 10, 2003, limited to 15 witnesses per side, including experts. No more than 5 witnesses may be added or substituted for witnesses previously listed, but in no event may the total number of witnesses included in the November 21 witness list exceed 15. All substitutions shall be made by November 21, 2003, except by agreement among the parties or by order of this Court upon good cause shown. The parties shall exchange tentative trial witness lists containing the order of their witnesses and the estimated time of direct examination on December 10, 2003. The parties shall exchange final trial witness lists containing the order of their witnesses and the estimated time of direct examination and cross examination on December 12, 2003. These witness lists and time estimates, on December 10 and December 12, shall be submitted to the Court.

5. Dauhert Hearing. The Court will hold a hearing on Dauhert and sufficiency of expert disclosure issues on December 5, 2003, to start at 1:00 p.m. and to terminate no later than 5:00 p.m.. To save trial time, this hearing shall be held for the benefit of the Court to explore the bases for expert opinions even if there are no disputes that require a Dauhert hearing.

6. Pre-Trial Briefs. The parties shall submit pre-trial briefs to the Court on or before December 10, 2003.

7. Pre-Trial Conference. The Court will schedule a pre-trial conference as its calendar permits.

8. Trial. A trial shall be held, beginning on December 15, 2003, and proceeding for seven business days through December 23, 2003. The estimated trial time is fifty (50) hours, to be conducted with chess clocks and divided between Plaintiffs and Defendants. At the status conference to be held on Wednesday, November 5, 2003, Plaintiffs are directed to inform the Court of the expected division of trial time amongst Plaintiffs, and Defendants are directed to inform the Court of the expected division of trial time amongst Defendants. Each side may also advance its position as to the percentage of trial time it should receive.

II. CASE MANAGEMENT

9. Initial Disclosure. The parties shall not be required to provide initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a).

10. Limit on Number of Depositions. Each side may take no more than 25 fact witness depositions, excluding any document custodian depositions that may be necessary to establish the admissibility of documents.

11. Limit on Duration of Depositions. In accordance with Rule 30(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all depositions are limited to one day 7 hours in length. To the extent either side takes more than 3.5 hours of deposition testimony of a non-party deponent, the other side *71 shall be permitted to exceed 3.5 hours by an equal amount of time. If any party seeks to depose a non-party witness for more than 3.5 hours, that party will provide all parties with 48 hours notice of an intention to exceed the 3.5 hour limitation on deposition examination. The parties and non-parties, if applicable, may stipulate to additional time for individual depositions. The deposition of defendants’ 30(b)(6) witness as concerning alleged efficiencies shall be limited to two days in length. Absent agreement of the parties, the duration of depositions provided for in this Order may be modified only by order of this Court for good cause shown.

12. Use of the Government’s Investigative Oral Examination Transcripts of Party Witnesses. Defendants will not object on hearsay grounds to the admissibility of transcripts of oral examinations of individuals who were their employees when examined, that were conducted by the Plaintiffs during Plaintiffs’ investigation of the transaction underlying this action. Proffered testimony must be identified by line and page number at the same time and in the same manner as deposition designations. If Plaintiffs offer investigative deposition testimony at trial, and the Defendants were not permitted to defend the deposition, these witnesses may be called at trial for purposes of cross-examination and re-direct.

13. Limit on the Number of Rule 15 Document Subpoenas. Neither side shall serve more than 25 document subpoenas on non-parties.

14. Limits on Written and Document Discovery. All document requests to parties shall be responded to and responsive documents produced within 10 calendar days after service. Parties will produce documents in either hard copy form, or, in the case of electronic documents, in the native electronic format (or a mutually agreeable format).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 F. Supp. 2d 69, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23458, 2003 WL 22463057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-first-data-concord-efs-inc-dcd-2003.