FEDERAL · 12 U.S.C. · Chapter 2

Omitted

12 U.S.C. § 86a
Title12Banks and Banking
Chapter2 — NATIONAL BANKS
SubchapterIV
Current throughPub. L. 119-99

This text of 12 U.S.C. § 86a (Omitted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
12 U.S.C. § 86a.

Text

Omitted

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
794 F. Supp. 312 (D. Minnesota, 1992)
26 case citations
Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.
25 B.R. 674 (S.D. California, 1982)
23 case citations
In Re Rexplore, Inc. Securities Litigation
671 F. Supp. 679 (N.D. California, 1987)
19 case citations
Bank of New York v. Hoyt
617 F. Supp. 1304 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)
16 case citations
Cornell & Co. v. Pace
703 S.W.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
12 case citations
Brann v. Flagship Bank of Pinellas, NA
450 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
9 case citations
First Am. Bank v. Windjammer Time Sharing
483 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
7 case citations
United States v. M.L. McReynolds
809 F.2d 1047 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
6 case citations
Crissey v. Alaska USA Federal Credit Union
811 P.2d 1057 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1991)
6 case citations
Medford v. Wholesale Electric Supply Co.
691 S.W.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1985)
5 case citations
United States v. McReynolds
628 F. Supp. 76 (N.D. Mississippi, 1986)
5 case citations
Walsh v. First State Bank of Pennock
409 N.W.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
4 case citations
Appeal of New England Power Co.
424 A.2d 807 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1980)
4 case citations
Worthen v. Dillard
628 S.W.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1982)
4 case citations
United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cage
487 So. 2d 171 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
3 case citations
Boyles v. Smith
759 P.2d 518 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1988)
3 case citations
Schueler v. Rayjas Enterprises, Inc.
847 F. Supp. 1147 (S.D. New York, 1994)
2 case citations
Norstar Bank v. Pickard
140 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
1 case citations

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
Section, Pub. L. 96–221, title V, §511, Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 164; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §324(b), (d), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1648, which authorized interest on business or agricultural loans of $1,000 or more at a rate of not more than 5 per centum in excess of the discount rate, was omitted pursuant to section 512 of Pub. L. 96–221 which made these provisions applicable only with respect to such loans made in any State during the period beginning on April 1, 1980, and ending on the earlier of (1) April 1, 1983, or (2) the date, on or after April 1, 1980, on which such State adopts a law or certifies that the voters of such State have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly that such State does not want these provisions to apply with respect to loans made in such State.
A prior section 86a, Pub. L. 96–161, title II, §205, Dec. 28, 1979, 93 Stat. 1237, similar to this section as enacted by Pub. L. 96–221, was repealed by section 529 of Pub. L. 96–221, effective at the close of Mar. 31, 1980, except that its provisions would continue to apply to any loan made, any deposit made, or any obligation issued in any State during any period when that section was in effect in such State. For the effective date provisions relating to the prior section 86a, see section 207 of Pub. L. 96–161.
Another prior section 86a, Pub. L. 96–104, title I, §105, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 791, identical to this section as enacted by Pub. L. 96–161, was repealed by section 212 of Pub. L. 96–161, effective at the close of Dec. 27, 1979, except that its provisions would continue to apply to loans made in any State on or after Nov. 5, 1979, but prior to such repeal.
Section 301 of Pub. L. 96–104, which limited the applicability of Pub. L. 96–104 to those States having a constitutional provision that all contracts for a greater rate of interest than 10 per centum per annum are void as to both principal and interest, was repealed by section 212 of Pub. L. 96–161, effective at the close of Dec. 27, 1979.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 U.S.C. § 86a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/12/86a.