FEDERAL · 12 U.S.C. · Chapter 27

Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts

12 U.S.C. § 2609
Title12Banks and Banking
Chapter27 — REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

This text of 12 U.S.C. § 2609 (Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
12 U.S.C. § 2609.

Text

(a)In general A lender, in connection with a federally related mortgage loan, may not require the borrower or prospective borrower—
(1)to deposit in any escrow account which may be established in connection with such loan for the purpose of assuring payment of taxes, insurance premiums, or other charges with respect to the property, in connection with the settlement, an aggregate sum (for such purpose) in excess of a sum that will be sufficient to pay such taxes, insurance premiums and other charges attributable to the period beginning on the last date on which each such charge would have been paid under the normal lending practice of the lender and local custom, provided that the selection of each such date constitutes prudent lending practice, and ending on the due date of its first fu

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eugene Telfair v. First Union Mortgage Corporation
216 F.3d 1333 (First Circuit, 2000)
141 case citations
Janet G. Patton v. Triad Guaranty Insurance Co.
277 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
86 case citations
DeBoer v. Mellon Mortgage Co.
64 F.3d 1171 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
80 case citations
Campbell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
545 F.3d 348 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
62 case citations
In Re Rodriguez
629 F.3d 136 (Third Circuit, 2010)
34 case citations
Jane McGinnis v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
901 F.3d 1282 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
23 case citations
Marais v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
24 F. Supp. 3d 712 (S.D. Ohio, 2014)
22 case citations
In Re Johnson
384 B.R. 763 (E.D. Michigan, 2008)
7 case citations
Sarsfield v. Citimortgage, Inc.
667 F. Supp. 2d 461 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
6 case citations
Flagg v. Yonkers Savings And Loan Association
396 F.3d 178 (Second Circuit, 2005)
3 case citations
Herrmann v. Meridian Mortgage Corp.
901 F. Supp. 915 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
2 case citations
Harris v. Sand Canyon Corp.
274 F.R.D. 556 (D. South Carolina, 2010)
2 case citations
Carr v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
132 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
2 case citations
Cantero v. Bank of Am., N.A.
(Second Circuit, 2022)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–533, §10, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 94–205, §8, Jan. 2, 1976, 89 Stat. 1158; Pub. L. 101–625, title IX, §942(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4411; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2103(g)(2), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–401; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098(8), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2104.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2010—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 111–203, which directed amendment of "section 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 2609(c) and (d))" by substituting "Bureau" for "Secretary", was executed by making the substitution only in subsec. (c) as directed.
1996—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "The Secretary" for "Not later than the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on November 28, 1990, the Secretary" in second sentence.
1990—Pub. L. 101–625 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
1976—Pub. L. 94–205 provided that in addition to amounts required for the payment of taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges due at settlement, the buyer could not be required at settlement to place into an escrow account more than one-sixth of the estimated total amount of such taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges payable within a twelve month period beginning on the date of settlement, but the buyer could be required to make monthly payments into an escrow account sufficient to maintain a surplus of one-sixth of the estimated total amount payable in the coming twelve month period.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2010 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–205 effective Jan. 2, 1976, see section 12 of Pub. L. 94–205, set out as a note under section 2602 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective 180 days after Dec. 22, 1974, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–533, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 U.S.C. § 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/12/2609.