FEDERAL · 12 U.S.C. · Chapter 27
Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts
12 U.S.C. § 2609
Title12 — Banks and Banking
Chapter27 — REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
This text of 12 U.S.C. § 2609 (Limitation on requirement of advance deposits in escrow accounts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
12 U.S.C. § 2609.
Text
(a)In general
A lender, in connection with a federally related mortgage loan, may not require the borrower or prospective borrower—
(1)to deposit in any escrow account which may be established in connection with such loan for the purpose of assuring payment of taxes, insurance premiums, or other charges with respect to the property, in connection with the settlement, an aggregate sum (for such purpose) in excess of a sum that will be sufficient to pay such taxes, insurance premiums and other charges attributable to the period beginning on the last date on which each such charge would have been paid under the normal lending practice of the lender and local custom, provided that the selection of each such date constitutes prudent lending practice, and ending on the due date of its first fu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eugene Telfair v. First Union Mortgage Corporation
216 F.3d 1333 (First Circuit, 2000)
Janet G. Patton v. Triad Guaranty Insurance Co.
277 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
DeBoer v. Mellon Mortgage Co.
64 F.3d 1171 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Boston v. Carol S. Greenwald, Etc.
591 F.2d 417 (First Circuit, 1979)
Campbell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
545 F.3d 348 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Luis and Margaret Vega, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit
622 F.2d 918 (First Circuit, 1980)
In Re Rodriguez
629 F.3d 136 (Third Circuit, 2010)
Jane McGinnis v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
901 F.3d 1282 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Marais v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
24 F. Supp. 3d 712 (S.D. Ohio, 2014)
In Re Johnson
384 B.R. 763 (E.D. Michigan, 2008)
Sarsfield v. Citimortgage, Inc.
667 F. Supp. 2d 461 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Flagg v. Yonkers Savings And Loan Association
396 F.3d 178 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Herrmann v. Meridian Mortgage Corp.
901 F. Supp. 915 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
Harris v. Sand Canyon Corp.
274 F.R.D. 556 (D. South Carolina, 2010)
Carr v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
132 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Rogers Morgan v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
(Fourth Circuit, 2022)
McCray v. Bank of America, Corp.
(D. Maryland, 2017)
Cantero v. Bank of Am., N.A.
(Second Circuit, 2022)
Cybulski v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
(N.D. Illinois, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–533, §10, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 94–205, §8, Jan. 2, 1976, 89 Stat. 1158; Pub. L. 101–625, title IX, §942(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4411; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2103(g)(2), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–401; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098(8), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2104.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 111–203, which directed amendment of "section 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 2609(c) and (d))" by substituting "Bureau" for "Secretary", was executed by making the substitution only in subsec. (c) as directed.
1996—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "The Secretary" for "Not later than the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on November 28, 1990, the Secretary" in second sentence.
1990—Pub. L. 101–625 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
1976—Pub. L. 94–205 provided that in addition to amounts required for the payment of taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges due at settlement, the buyer could not be required at settlement to place into an escrow account more than one-sixth of the estimated total amount of such taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges payable within a twelve month period beginning on the date of settlement, but the buyer could be required to make monthly payments into an escrow account sufficient to maintain a surplus of one-sixth of the estimated total amount payable in the coming twelve month period.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2010 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–205 effective Jan. 2, 1976, see section 12 of Pub. L. 94–205, set out as a note under section 2602 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 180 days after Dec. 22, 1974, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–533, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 111–203, which directed amendment of "section 10(c) (12 U.S.C. 2609(c) and (d))" by substituting "Bureau" for "Secretary", was executed by making the substitution only in subsec. (c) as directed.
1996—Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "The Secretary" for "Not later than the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on November 28, 1990, the Secretary" in second sentence.
1990—Pub. L. 101–625 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
1976—Pub. L. 94–205 provided that in addition to amounts required for the payment of taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges due at settlement, the buyer could not be required at settlement to place into an escrow account more than one-sixth of the estimated total amount of such taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges payable within a twelve month period beginning on the date of settlement, but the buyer could be required to make monthly payments into an escrow account sufficient to maintain a surplus of one-sixth of the estimated total amount payable in the coming twelve month period.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2010 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–205 effective Jan. 2, 1976, see section 12 of Pub. L. 94–205, set out as a note under section 2602 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 180 days after Dec. 22, 1974, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–533, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 U.S.C. § 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/12/2609.