FEDERAL · 12 U.S.C. · Chapter 16

Depository institution employee protection remedy

12 U.S.C. § 1831j
Title12Banks and Banking
Chapter16 — FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

This text of 12 U.S.C. § 1831j (Depository institution employee protection remedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
12 U.S.C. § 1831j.

Text

(a)In general No insured depository institution may discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or any person acting pursuant to the request of the employee) provided information to any Federal banking agency or to the Attorney General regarding—
(A)a possible violation of any law or regulation; or
(B)gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; by the depository institution or any director, officer, or employee of the institution. No Federal banking agency, Federal home loan bank, Federal reserve bank, or any person who is performing, directly or indirectly, any function or service on beha

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blab T v. of Mobile, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.
182 F.3d 851 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
94 case citations
Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp.
767 F. Supp. 167 (N.D. Illinois, 1991)
20 case citations
Walleri v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle
83 F.3d 1575 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
14 case citations
Fenno v. Mountain West Bank
2008 MT 267 (Montana Supreme Court, 2008)
13 case citations
Burford v. Yellen
246 F. Supp. 3d 161 (District of Columbia, 2017)
11 case citations
Segarra v. Federal Reserve Bank
802 F.3d 409 (Second Circuit, 2015)
9 case citations
Walleri v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle
965 F. Supp. 1459 (D. Oregon, 1997)
7 case citations
Blab T v. v. Comcast Cable
182 F.3d 851 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
1 case citations
Michael J. Haley v. Nicolas P. Retsinas
138 F.3d 1245 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
1 case citations
Fruge v. Powell
(District of Columbia, 2022)

Source Credit

History

(Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, §2[33], as added Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §932(a), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 494; amended Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §251(a)(1)–(3), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2331, 2332; Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2406; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(a)(61), (c), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2291; Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §363(10), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1555.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2010—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Comptroller of the Currency" for "Federal Housing Finance Board, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision".
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c), amended directory language of Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a). See 1993 Amendment note below.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(a)(61), substituted semicolon for comma at end.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c)(1)–(3), amended directory language of Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a)(1)(B). See 1993 Amendment note below.
1993—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a)(1)(A), as amended by Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c)(1)–(3), substituted "regarding—
"(A) a possible violation of any law or regulation; or
"(B) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;
by the depository institution or any director, officer, or employee of the institution." for "regarding any possible violation of any law or regulation by the depository institution or any director, officer, or employee of the institution."
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a)(2)(A), (B), as amended by Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c)(1), (2), (4), in introductory provisions, substituted "Federal reserve bank, or any person who is performing, directly or indirectly, any function or service on behalf of the Corporation" for "or Federal Reserve bank" and "any possible violation of any law or regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety by" for "any possible violation of any law or regulation by".
Subsec. (a)(2)(D). Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a)(2)(C)–(E), as amended by Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c)(1), (2), (4), added subpar. (D).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 103–204, §21(a)(1)(B), as amended by Pub. L. 103–325, §602(c)(1)–(3), added subsec. (f).
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–242, §251(a)(1), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "No federally insured depository institution may discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or any person acting pursuant to the request of the employee) provided information to any Federal banking agency or to the Attorney General regarding a possible violation of any law or regulation by the depository institution or any of its officers, directors, or employees."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–242, §251(a)(2), inserted ", Federal home loan bank, Federal Reserve bank, or Federal banking agency".
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 102–242, §251(a)(3), added subsec. (e).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2010 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the transfer date, see section 351 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 906 of Title 2, The Congress.

Effective Date of 1991 Amendment
Pub. L. 102–242, title II, §251(a)(4), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2332, provided that: "Paragraph (2) of section 33(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1831j(a)(2)] (as added under the amendment made by paragraph (1)) shall be treated as having taken effect on January 1, 1987, and for purposes of any cause of action arising under such paragraph (as so effective) before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 19, 1991], the 2-year period referred to in section 33(b) of such Act shall be deemed to begin on such date of enactment."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 U.S.C. § 1831j, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/12/1831j.