FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—THE PLAN

Effect of confirmation

11 U.S.C. § 944
Title11Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—THE PLAN

This text of 11 U.S.C. § 944 (Effect of confirmation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 944.

Text

(a)The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and any creditor, whether or not—
(1)a proof of such creditor's claim is filed or deemed filed under section 501 of this title;
(2)such claim is allowed under section 502 of this title; or
(3)such creditor has accepted the plan.
(b)Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, the debtor is discharged from all debts as of the time when—
(1)the plan is confirmed;
(2)the debtor deposits any consideration to be distributed under the plan with a disbursing agent appointed by the court; and
(3)the court has determined—
(A)that any security so deposited will constitute, after distribution, a valid legal obligation of the debtor; and
(B)that any provision made to pay or secure payment of such obligation is valid.
(c)The debt

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co.
744 F.2d 332 (Third Circuit, 1984)
80 case citations
Carole O'LOghLin v. County of Orange
229 F.3d 871 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
71 case citations
Watson v. City National Bank (In Re Watson)
78 B.R. 267 (C.D. California, 1987)
20 case citations
Barraford v. T&N Limited
778 F.3d 258 (First Circuit, 2015)
16 case citations
In re City of Detroit
548 B.R. 748 (E.D. Michigan, 2016)
16 case citations
In Re City of Colorado Springs Spring Creek General Improvement District
187 B.R. 683 (D. Colorado, 1995)
10 case citations
Jason Deocampo v. Jason Potts
836 F.3d 1134 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
9 case citations
In Re City of Columbia Falls
143 B.R. 750 (D. Montana, 1992)
5 case citations
In Re Baker
217 B.R. 609 (N.D. California, 1998)
4 case citations
Bank of New York Mellon v. Jefferson County (In re Jefferson County)
482 B.R. 404 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
3 case citations
Boeing North American, Inc. v. Ybarra
424 F.3d 1018 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
3 case citations
In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico
361 F. Supp. 3d 203 (U.S. District Court, 2019)
3 case citations
Nebraska Security Bank v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 7
119 B.R. 193 (D. Nebraska, 1990)
2 case citations
In Re Sanitary & Improvement District No. 7
112 B.R. 990 (D. Nebraska, 1990)
1 case citations
Rhita Bercy v. City of Phoenix
103 F.4th 591 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
1 case citations
Holmon v. Village of Alorton
2016 IL App (5th) 150404 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2017)
1 case citations
Holmon v. The Village of Alorton
2016 IL App (5th) 150404 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2016)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2624.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

senate report no. 95–989
[Section 947] Subsection (a) [enacted as section 944(a)] makes the provisions of a confirmed plan binding on the debtor and creditors. It is derived from section 95(a) of chapter 9 [section 415(a) of former title 11].
Subsections (b) and (c) [enacted as section 944(b) and (c)] provide for the discharge of a municipality. The discharge is essentially the same as that granted under section 95(b) of the Bankruptcy Act [section 415(b) of former title 11].

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/944.