FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
Confirmation hearing
11 U.S.C. § 1324
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 1324 (Confirmation hearing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 1324.
Text
(a)Except as provided in subsection (b) and after notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of the plan. A party in interest may object to confirmation of the plan.
(b)The hearing on confirmation of the plan may be held not earlier than 20 days and not later than 45 days after the date of the meeting of creditors under section 341(a), unless the court determines that it would be in the best interests of the creditors and the estate to hold such hearing at an earlier date and there is no objection to such earlier date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald Estus
695 F.2d 311 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
SLW Capital, LLC v. Mansaray-Ruffin
530 F.3d 230 (Third Circuit, 2008)
Matter Of Lisse
921 F.3d 629 (Seventh Circuit, 2019)
Robert Miller v. United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Home Administration
907 F.2d 80 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Max v. Northington (In Re Northington)
876 F.3d 1302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
In Re Anastasios
72 B.R. 908 (W.D. North Carolina, 1987)
In Re Torres
15 B.R. 794 (E.D. New York, 1981)
LVNV Funding, LLC v. Derrick Harling
852 F.3d 367 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Rhode Island Central Credit Union v. Zimble (In Re Zimble)
47 B.R. 639 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)
In Re Raphael
238 B.R. 69 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
Hildebrand v. Hays Imports, Inc. (In Re Johnson)
279 B.R. 218 (M.D. Tennessee, 2002)
Matter of Eaton
130 B.R. 74 (S.D. Iowa, 1991)
In Re Johnson
69 B.R. 726 (W.D. New York, 1987)
Ravenot v. Rimgale
669 F.2d 426 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Transamerica Financial Services, Inc. v. Stollenwerck (In Re Stollenwerck)
8 B.R. 297 (M.D. Alabama, 1981)
Freddie Brown v. Mary Viegelahn
960 F.3d 711 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
Stephen Stanley v. FCA US, LLC
51 F.4th 215 (Sixth Circuit, 2022)
In Re Powell
223 B.R. 225 (N.D. Alabama, 1998)
In Re: John Castleman, Sr. v. Dennis Burman
75 F.4th 1052 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Title Max v. Hurst (In re Wilber)
551 B.R. 542 (M.D. Georgia, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2649; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §529, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §283(x), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3118; Pub. L. 109–8, title III, §317, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 92.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
Any party in interest may object to the confirmation of a plan, as distinguished from merely rejecting a plan. An objection to confirmation is predicated on failure of the plan or the procedures employed prior to confirmation to conform with the requirements of chapter 13. The bankruptcy judge is required to provide notice and an opportunity for hearing any such objection to confirmation.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Pub. L. 109–8 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "Except as provided in subsection (b) and after" for "After", and added subsec. (b).
1986—Pub. L. 99–554 struck out "the" after "object to".
1984—Pub. L. 98–353 struck out "the" before "confirmation of the plan".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
senate report no. 95–989
Any party in interest may object to the confirmation of a plan, as distinguished from merely rejecting a plan. An objection to confirmation is predicated on failure of the plan or the procedures employed prior to confirmation to conform with the requirements of chapter 13. The bankruptcy judge is required to provide notice and an opportunity for hearing any such objection to confirmation.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Pub. L. 109–8 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "Except as provided in subsection (b) and after" for "After", and added subsec. (b).
1986—Pub. L. 99–554 struck out "the" after "object to".
1984—Pub. L. 98–353 struck out "the" before "confirmation of the plan".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 1324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/1324.