FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—RAILROAD REORGANIZATION
Collective bargaining agreements
11 U.S.C. § 1167
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—RAILROAD REORGANIZATION
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 1167 (Collective bargaining agreements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 1167.
Text
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco
465 U.S. 513 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Local Unions 20, 26, 34, 89, 92, 124, 135, 142, 159, 279, 299, 377, 406, 428, 486, 543, 571, 580, 614, 637, 836, 908 v. Brada Miller Freight System
702 F.2d 890 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
In Re Bildisco
682 F.2d 72 (Third Circuit, 1982)
National Labor Relations Board v. Brada Miller Freight System, Inc. (In Re Brada Miller Freight System, Inc.)
16 B.R. 1002 (N.D. Alabama, 1981)
Haas v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Haas)
48 F.3d 1153 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Matter of Valuation Proceedings, Etc.
531 F. Supp. 1191 (Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act, 1982)
Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.)
114 B.R. 379 (S.D. New York, 1990)
In Re Concrete Pipe MacHinery Co.
28 B.R. 837 (N.D. Iowa, 1983)
California Department of Water Resources v. Calpine Corp.
337 B.R. 27 (S.D. New York, 2006)
In Re the Rath Packing Co.
36 B.R. 979 (N.D. Iowa, 1984)
A & B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. United States (In Re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.)
48 B.R. 397 (M.D. Florida, 1985)
In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Appeals of Railway Labor Executives' Association
827 F.2d 112 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
In Re Michigan-Wisconsin Transportation Co.
161 B.R. 628 (W.D. Michigan, 1993)
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco
682 F.2d 72 (Third Circuit, 1982)
United Transportation Union v. Michigan Interstate Railway Co. (In Re Michigan Interstate Railway Co.)
34 B.R. 220 (E.D. Michigan, 1983)
Comair, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n (In Re Delta Air Lines, Inc.)
359 B.R. 491 (S.D. New York, 2007)
New York, Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp. v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n (In re Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.)
120 B.R. 772 (D. Delaware, 1990)
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
944 F. Supp. 2d 363 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2642; Pub. L. 103–394, title V, §501(d)(35), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4146.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
Section 1176 [enacted as section 1167] is derived from present section 77(n) [section 205(n) of former title 11]. It provides that notwithstanding the general section governing the rejection of executory contracts (section 365), neither the court nor the trustee may change the wages or working conditions of employees of the debtor established by a collective bargaining agreement that is subject to the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], except in accordance with section 6 of that Act [45 U.S.C. 156]. As reported by the subcommittee this section provided that wages and salaries of rail employees could not be affected by the trustee, but that work rules could be rejected by the trustee. The reorganization court was given the authority to review the trustee's decisions and to settle any disputes arising from the rejection. This provision was withdrawn by the full committee, and hearings will be conducted next year by the Human Resources Committee in the area of rail labor contracts and the trustee's ability to reject them in a bankruptcy situation.
house report no. 95–595
Section 1167 is derived from present section 77(n) [section 205(n) of former title 11]. It provides that notwithstanding the general section governing the rejection of executory contracts (section 365), neither the court nor the trustee may change the wages or working conditions of employees of the debtor established by a collective bargaining agreement that is subject to the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], except in accordance with section 6 of that Act [45 U.S.C. 156]. The subject of railway labor is too delicate and has too long a history for this code to upset established relationships. The balance has been struck over the years. This provision continues that balance unchanged.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Railway Labor Act, referred to in text, is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. Section 6 of the Act is classified to section 156 of Title 45. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–394 struck out "(45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.)" after "Railway Labor Act" and "(45 U.S.C. 156)" after "such Act".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 1176 [enacted as section 1167] is derived from present section 77(n) [section 205(n) of former title 11]. It provides that notwithstanding the general section governing the rejection of executory contracts (section 365), neither the court nor the trustee may change the wages or working conditions of employees of the debtor established by a collective bargaining agreement that is subject to the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], except in accordance with section 6 of that Act [45 U.S.C. 156]. As reported by the subcommittee this section provided that wages and salaries of rail employees could not be affected by the trustee, but that work rules could be rejected by the trustee. The reorganization court was given the authority to review the trustee's decisions and to settle any disputes arising from the rejection. This provision was withdrawn by the full committee, and hearings will be conducted next year by the Human Resources Committee in the area of rail labor contracts and the trustee's ability to reject them in a bankruptcy situation.
house report no. 95–595
Section 1167 is derived from present section 77(n) [section 205(n) of former title 11]. It provides that notwithstanding the general section governing the rejection of executory contracts (section 365), neither the court nor the trustee may change the wages or working conditions of employees of the debtor established by a collective bargaining agreement that is subject to the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], except in accordance with section 6 of that Act [45 U.S.C. 156]. The subject of railway labor is too delicate and has too long a history for this code to upset established relationships. The balance has been struck over the years. This provision continues that balance unchanged.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Railway Labor Act, referred to in text, is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. Section 6 of the Act is classified to section 156 of Title 45. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–394 struck out "(45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.)" after "Railway Labor Act" and "(45 U.S.C. 156)" after "such Act".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/1167.