FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
Modification of plan
11 U.S.C. § 1127
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 1127 (Modification of plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 1127.
Text
(a)The proponent of a plan may modify such plan at any time before confirmation, but may not modify such plan so that such plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of this title. After the proponent of a plan files a modification of such plan with the court, the plan as modified becomes the plan.
(b)The proponent of a plan or the reorganized debtor may modify such plan at any time after confirmation of such plan and before substantial consummation of such plan, but may not modify such plan so that such plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of this title. Such plan as modified under this subsection becomes the plan only if circumstances warrant such modification and the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such pl
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
554 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 2008)
In the Matter Of: Unr Industries, Inc., Debtors. Appeals of Unarco Bloomington Factory Workers
20 F.3d 766 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
In Re Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Fruehauf Corporation v. Jartran, Inc.
886 F.2d 859 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
In Re Longardner & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Landahl, Brown & Weed Associates, Inc
855 F.2d 455 (Seventh Circuit, 1988)
Sure-Snap Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.
948 F.2d 869 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Federal Communications Commission v. Airadigm Communications, Inc.
616 F.3d 642 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
Thomas Holstein v. Kevin Brill
987 F.2d 1268 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
In Re: American Preferred Prescription, Inc., Debtor. Kenneth P. Silverman, Esq., Trustee-Appellant v. Tracar, S.A.
255 F.3d 87 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Alberta Energy Partners v. Blast Energy Services, Inc. (In Re Blast Energy Services, Inc.)
593 F.3d 418 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Douglas H. Turney v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and William Mark Bonney, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Calvin E. Pierce
18 F.3d 865 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
40 Collier bankr.cas.2d 787, Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,763 in the Matter of William L. Greenig and Troy W. Greenig, Debtors-Appellees. Appeal of United Feeds, Incorporated, Creditor
152 F.3d 631 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Enron Corp. v. The New Power Co.
438 F.3d 1113 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
In Re Northampton Corp.
59 B.R. 963 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1984)
In Re: Heartland Steel, Inc.
389 F.3d 741 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
Beeman v. BGI Creditors' Liquidating Trust (In re BGI, Inc.)
87 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 717 (S.D. New York, 2014)
United States v. Novak
86 B.R. 625 (D. South Dakota, 1988)
Highland Captl v. Highland Captl Mgmt
57 F.4th 494 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Emilio Braun v. America-CV Station Group, Inc.
56 F.4th 1302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2023)
Ladd v. Ries (In Re Ladd)
319 B.R. 599 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust
86 F.3d 364 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2635; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §511, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 386; Pub. L. 109–8, title III, §321(e), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 96; Pub. L. 111–327, §2(a)(34), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3561.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 1127(a) of the House amendment adopts a provision contained in the House bill permitting only the proponent of a plan to modify the plan and rejecting the alternative of open modification contained in the Senate amendment.
senate report no. 95–989
Under subsection (a) the proponent may file a proposal to modify a plan prior to confirmation. In the case of a public company the modifying proposal may be filed prior to approval.
Subsection (b) provides that a party in interest eligible to file a plan may file instead of a plan a proposal to modify a plan filed by another. Under subsection (c) a party in interest objecting to some feature of a plan may submit a proposal to modify the plan to meet the objection.
After a plan has been confirmed, but before its substantial consummation, a plan may be modified by leave of court, which subsection (d) provides shall be granted for good cause. Subsection (e) provides that a proposal to modify a plan is subject to the disclosure requirements of section 1125 and as provided in subsection (f). It provides that a creditor or stockholder who voted for or against a plan is deemed to have accepted or rejected the modifying proposal. But if the modification materially and adversely affects any of their interests, they must be afforded an opportunity to change their vote in accordance with the disclosure and solicitation requirements of section 1125.
Under subsection (g) a plan, if modified prior to confirmation, shall be confirmed if it meets the requirements of section 1130.
house report no. 95–595
Subsection (a) permits the proponent of a plan to modify it at any time before confirmation, subject, of course, to the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123, governing classification and contents of a plan. After the proponent of a plan files a modification with the court, the plan as modified becomes the plan, and is to be treated the same as an original plan.
Subsection (b) permits modification of a plan after confirmation under certain circumstances. The modification must be proposed before substantial consummation of the plan. The requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 continue to apply. The plan as modified under this subsection becomes the plan only if the court confirms the plan as modified under section 1129 and the circumstances warrant the modification.
Subsection (c) requires the proponent of a modification to comply with the disclosure provisions of section 1125. Of course, if the modification were sufficiently minor, the court might determine that additional disclosure was not required under the circumstances.
Subsection (d) simplifies modification procedure by deeming any creditor or equity security holder that has already accepted or rejected the plan to have accepted or rejected the modification, unless, within the time fixed by the court, the creditor or equity security holder changes this previous acceptance or rejection.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 111–327 substituted "subsection (e)" for "subsection (a)".
2005—Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 109–8 added subsecs. (e) and (f).
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353, §511(a), inserted "of a plan" after "After the proponent", and "of such plan" after "modification".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–353, §511(b), substituted "circumstances warrant such modification and the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such plan as modified, under section 1129 of this title" for "the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such plan, as modified, under section 1129 of this title, and circumstances warrant such modification".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
legislative statements
Section 1127(a) of the House amendment adopts a provision contained in the House bill permitting only the proponent of a plan to modify the plan and rejecting the alternative of open modification contained in the Senate amendment.
senate report no. 95–989
Under subsection (a) the proponent may file a proposal to modify a plan prior to confirmation. In the case of a public company the modifying proposal may be filed prior to approval.
Subsection (b) provides that a party in interest eligible to file a plan may file instead of a plan a proposal to modify a plan filed by another. Under subsection (c) a party in interest objecting to some feature of a plan may submit a proposal to modify the plan to meet the objection.
After a plan has been confirmed, but before its substantial consummation, a plan may be modified by leave of court, which subsection (d) provides shall be granted for good cause. Subsection (e) provides that a proposal to modify a plan is subject to the disclosure requirements of section 1125 and as provided in subsection (f). It provides that a creditor or stockholder who voted for or against a plan is deemed to have accepted or rejected the modifying proposal. But if the modification materially and adversely affects any of their interests, they must be afforded an opportunity to change their vote in accordance with the disclosure and solicitation requirements of section 1125.
Under subsection (g) a plan, if modified prior to confirmation, shall be confirmed if it meets the requirements of section 1130.
house report no. 95–595
Subsection (a) permits the proponent of a plan to modify it at any time before confirmation, subject, of course, to the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123, governing classification and contents of a plan. After the proponent of a plan files a modification with the court, the plan as modified becomes the plan, and is to be treated the same as an original plan.
Subsection (b) permits modification of a plan after confirmation under certain circumstances. The modification must be proposed before substantial consummation of the plan. The requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 continue to apply. The plan as modified under this subsection becomes the plan only if the court confirms the plan as modified under section 1129 and the circumstances warrant the modification.
Subsection (c) requires the proponent of a modification to comply with the disclosure provisions of section 1125. Of course, if the modification were sufficiently minor, the court might determine that additional disclosure was not required under the circumstances.
Subsection (d) simplifies modification procedure by deeming any creditor or equity security holder that has already accepted or rejected the plan to have accepted or rejected the modification, unless, within the time fixed by the court, the creditor or equity security holder changes this previous acceptance or rejection.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 111–327 substituted "subsection (e)" for "subsection (a)".
2005—Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 109–8 added subsecs. (e) and (f).
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353, §511(a), inserted "of a plan" after "After the proponent", and "of such plan" after "modification".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–353, §511(b), substituted "circumstances warrant such modification and the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such plan as modified, under section 1129 of this title" for "the court, after notice and a hearing, confirms such plan, as modified, under section 1129 of this title, and circumstances warrant such modification".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/1127.