FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL

Art. 63. Rehearings

10 U.S.C. § 863
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 863 (Art. 63. Rehearings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 863.

Text

(a)Each rehearing under this chapter shall take place before a court-martial composed of members not members of the court-martial which first heard the case. Upon a rehearing the accused may not be tried for any offense of which he was found not guilty by the first court-martial, and no sentence in excess of or more severe than the original sentence may be adjudged, unless the sentence is based upon a finding of guilty of an offense not considered upon the merits in the original proceedings, or unless the sentence prescribed for the offense is mandatory.
(b)If the sentence adjudged by the first court-martial was in accordance with a plea agreement under section 853a of this title (article 53a) and the accused at the rehearing does not comply with the agreement, or if a plea of guilty was

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Granderson
511 U.S. 39 (Supreme Court, 1994)
310 case citations
United States v. Smith
13 C.M.A. 105 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1962)
173 case citations
United States v. Mizgala
61 M.J. 122 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
129 case citations
United States v. Ruppel
49 M.J. 247 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
94 case citations
United States v. Gaskins
72 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
61 case citations
United States v. Poole
26 M.J. 272 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
48 case citations
United States v. New
55 M.J. 95 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
47 case citations
United States v. Dean
7 C.M.A. 721 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
36 case citations
Waller v. Swift
30 M.J. 139 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1990)
36 case citations
United States v. Manuel
43 M.J. 282 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1995)
34 case citations
United States v. Rosendahl
53 M.J. 344 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
34 case citations
United States v. Jones
10 C.M.A. 532 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
25 case citations
United States v. David Bernard Barash
428 F.2d 328 (Second Circuit, 1970)
23 case citations
United States v. Cook
12 M.J. 448 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
23 case citations
United States v. Ivory
9 C.M.A. 516 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
21 case citations
United States v. Eschmann
11 C.M.A. 64 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
21 case citations
United States v. Mills
12 M.J. 1 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
21 case citations
United States v. Lilly
25 M.J. 403 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
21 case citations
United States v. Martinez
11 C.M.A. 224 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
19 case citations
United States v. Hayes
7 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
17 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 58; Pub. L. 98–209, §5(d), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1398; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1065, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2506; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, §5327, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2929; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, §531(i), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1385.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "In such a" are substituted for the words "in which".
In subsection (b), the word "Each" is substituted for the word "Every". The word "may" is substituted for the word "shall" in the second sentence.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2017—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–91 inserted ", subject to such limitations as the President may prescribe by regulation" before period at end.
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "may be adjudged" for "may be approved" in second sentence, struck out at end "If the sentence approved after the first court-martial was in accordance with a pretrial agreement and the accused at the rehearing changes his plea with respect to the charges or specifications upon which the pretrial agreement was based, or otherwise does not comply with the pretrial agreement, the approved sentence as to those charges or specifications may include any punishment not in excess of that lawfully adjudged at the first court-martial.", and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1992—Pub. L. 102–484 substituted "approved" for "imposed" in second sentence and inserted "approved" before last reference to "sentence" in third sentence.
1983—Pub. L. 98–209 struck out subsec. (a) which provided that if the convening authority disapproved the findings and sentence of a court-martial he could, except where there was lack of sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, order a rehearing, stating the reasons for disapproval, and that if he disapproved the findings without reordering a rehearing, he had to dismiss the charges, and redesignated former subsec. (b) as entire section, and, as so redesignated, inserted "under this chapter" after "Each rehearing", and inserted provision that if the sentence approved after the first court-martial was in accordance with a pretrial agreement and the accused at the rehearing changes his plea with respect to the charges or specifications upon which the pretrial agreement was based, or otherwise does not comply with the pretrial agreement, the sentence as to those charges or specifications may include any punishment not in excess of that lawfully adjudged at the first court-martial.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2017 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–91 effective immediately after the amendments made by div. E (§§5001–5542) of Pub. L. 114–328 take effect as provided for in section 5542 of that Act (10 U.S.C. 801 note), see section 531(p) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–484 effective Oct. 23, 1992, and applicable with respect to offenses committed on or after that date, see section 1067 of Pub. L. 102–484, set out as a note under section 803 of this title.

Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, but not to apply to any case in which the findings and sentence were adjudged by a court-martial before that date, and the proceedings in any such case to be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been enacted, see section 12(a)(1), (4) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/863.