FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Art. 50. Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry

10 U.S.C. § 850
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 850 (Art. 50. Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 850.

Text

(a)Use as Evidence by Any Party.—In any case not capital and not extending to the dismissal of a commissioned officer, the sworn testimony, contained in the duly authenticated record of proceedings of a court of inquiry, of a person whose oral testimony cannot be obtained, may, if otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence, be read in evidence by any party before a court-martial or military commission if the accused was a party before the court of inquiry and if the same issue was involved or if the accused consents to the introduction of such evidence. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.
(b)Use as Evidence by Defense.—Such testimony may be read in evidence only by the defense in capital cases or cases extending to the d

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harold R. Conn v. The United States
376 F.2d 878 (Court of Claims, 1967)
36 case citations
United States v. McNutt
62 M.J. 16 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
33 case citations
United States v. Connor
27 M.J. 378 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
12 case citations
Golding v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 697 (Federal Claims, 2001)
10 case citations
United States v. Obligacion
17 C.M.A. 36 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
9 case citations
Henry L. Gardner v. Erik K. Shinseki
22 Vet. App. 415 (Veterans Claims, 2009)
9 case citations
United States v. Arruza
21 M.J. 591 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1985)
9 case citations
Leslie F. Narum v. United States
287 F.2d 897 (Court of Claims, 1960)
8 case citations
United States v. Tarver
29 M.J. 605 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1989)
4 case citations
Freeman v. Stuart
33 M.J. 659 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1991)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 54; Pub. L. 109–366, §4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5232, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2915.)

Editorial Notes

In subsections (a) and (b), the word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328, §5232(b), amended section catchline generally, substituting "Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry" for "Admissibility of records of courts of inquiry".
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328, §5232(c)(1), inserted heading.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, §5232(c)(2), inserted heading.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, §5232(c)(3), inserted heading.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328, §5232(a), added subsec. (d).
2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–366 inserted last sentence.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/850.