FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE
Art. 49. Depositions
10 U.S.C. § 849
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 849 (Art. 49. Depositions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 849.
Text
(a)In General.—
(1)Subject to paragraph (2), a convening authority or a military judge may order depositions at the request of any party.
(2)A deposition may be ordered under paragraph (1) only if the requesting party demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the testimony of a prospective witness be preserved for use at a court-martial, military commission, court of inquiry, or other military court or board.
(3)A party who requests a deposition under this section shall give to every other party reasonable written notice of the time and place for the deposition.
(4)A deposition under this section shall be taken before, and authenticated by, an impartial officer, as follows:
(A)Whenever practicable, by an impartial judge advocate certifi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
548 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield Branch
295 F.3d 966 (First Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Jacoby
11 C.M.A. 428 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
United States v. Matthews
16 M.J. 354 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
United States v. Stuckey
10 M.J. 347 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
United States v. Samuels
10 C.M.A. 206 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
United States v. Curtis
32 M.J. 252 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1991)
United States v. Donati
14 C.M.A. 235 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
United States v. Norfleet
53 M.J. 262 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
United States v. Cokeley
22 M.J. 225 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1986)
United States v. Enloe
15 C.M.A. 256 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)
United States v. Bennett
12 M.J. 463 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Killebrew
9 M.J. 154 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
United States v. Davis
19 C.M.A. 217 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Brady
8 C.M.A. 456 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Vanderwier
25 M.J. 263 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1987)
United States v. Geib
9 C.M.A. 392 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
United States v. Tomaszewski
8 C.M.A. 266 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Chestnut
2 M.J. 84 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Crockett
21 M.J. 423 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1986)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 53; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(20), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1340; Pub. L. 98–209, §6(b), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1400; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(a)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §532, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3366; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5231, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2914.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity.
In subsection (d), the word "Commonwealth" is inserted to reflect the present status of Puerto Rico. The words "of Columbia" are inserted after the word "District" for clarity. The words "the distance of" are omitted as surplusage.
In subsections (e) and (f), the words "the requirements of" and the words "of this article" are omitted as surplusage. The word "presented" is substituted for the word "adduced" in subsection (e).
In subsection (f), the word "directs" is substituted for the words "shall have directed". The words "by law" are omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (f) relating to ordering depositions, notice, military and civil officers authorized to take depositions, use of depositions as evidence, testimony by deposition by the defense in capital cases, and use of deposition as evidence in cases in which the death penalty is authorized, respectively.
2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30), any party may take oral or written depositions unless the military judge or court-martial without a military judge hearing the case or, if the case is not being heard, an authority competent to convene a court-martial for the trial of those charges forbids it for good cause. If a deposition is to be taken before charges are referred for trial, such an authority may designate commissioned officers to represent the prosecution and the defense and may authorize those officers to take the deposition of any witness."
2006—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 109–163 struck out "Territory," after "State,".
1983—Subsecs. (d), (f). Pub. L. 98–209 inserted "or, in the case of audiotape, videotape, or similar material, may be played in evidence" after "read in evidence".
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–632 inserted reference to the taking of depositions being forbidden by the military judge or the court-martial without a military judge if the case is being heard.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective on first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, but not to apply to any case in which the findings and sentence were adjudged by a court-martial before that date, and the proceedings in any such case to be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been enacted, see section 12(a)(1), (4) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
In subsection (d), the word "Commonwealth" is inserted to reflect the present status of Puerto Rico. The words "of Columbia" are inserted after the word "District" for clarity. The words "the distance of" are omitted as surplusage.
In subsections (e) and (f), the words "the requirements of" and the words "of this article" are omitted as surplusage. The word "presented" is substituted for the word "adduced" in subsection (e).
In subsection (f), the word "directs" is substituted for the words "shall have directed". The words "by law" are omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (f) relating to ordering depositions, notice, military and civil officers authorized to take depositions, use of depositions as evidence, testimony by deposition by the defense in capital cases, and use of deposition as evidence in cases in which the death penalty is authorized, respectively.
2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30), any party may take oral or written depositions unless the military judge or court-martial without a military judge hearing the case or, if the case is not being heard, an authority competent to convene a court-martial for the trial of those charges forbids it for good cause. If a deposition is to be taken before charges are referred for trial, such an authority may designate commissioned officers to represent the prosecution and the defense and may authorize those officers to take the deposition of any witness."
2006—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 109–163 struck out "Territory," after "State,".
1983—Subsecs. (d), (f). Pub. L. 98–209 inserted "or, in the case of audiotape, videotape, or similar material, may be played in evidence" after "read in evidence".
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–632 inserted reference to the taking of depositions being forbidden by the military judge or the court-martial without a military judge if the case is being heard.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective on first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, but not to apply to any case in which the findings and sentence were adjudged by a court-martial before that date, and the proceedings in any such case to be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been enacted, see section 12(a)(1), (4) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/849.