FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—APPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT
Art. 9. Imposition of restraint
10 U.S.C. § 809
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—APPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 809 (Art. 9. Imposition of restraint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 809.
Text
(a)Arrest is the restraint of a person by an order, not imposed as a punishment for an offense, directing him to remain within certain specified limits. Confinement is the physical restraint of a person.
(b)An enlisted member may be ordered into arrest or confinement by any commissioned officer by an order, oral or written, delivered in person or through other persons subject to this chapter. A commanding officer may authorize warrant officers, petty officers, or noncommissioned officers to order enlisted members of his command or subject to his authority into arrest or confinement.
(c)A commissioned officer, a warrant officer, or a civilian subject to this chapter or to trial thereunder may be ordered into arrest or confinement only by a commanding officer to whose authority he is subj
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Davenport
9 M.J. 364 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
State v. Morley
952 P.2d 167 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Weiss
36 M.J. 224 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
United States v. Donald Eugene Banks
539 F.2d 14 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Courtney v. Williams
1 M.J. 267 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Felty
12 M.J. 438 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Kinane
1 M.J. 309 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonald
531 F.2d 196 (Fourth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Lynch
13 M.J. 394 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Rexroat
38 M.J. 292 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1993)
United States v. White
17 C.M.A. 211 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Williams
16 C.M.A. 589 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Jason W. Mullin
178 F.3d 334 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Ellsey
16 C.M.A. 455 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)
United States v. Davidson
14 M.J. 81 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
Kelly v. United States
23 C.M.A. 567 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1975)
United States v. Haynes
15 C.M.A. 122 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)
United States v. Nelson
5 M.J. 189 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Cordero
11 M.J. 210 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
United States v. Schuber
70 M.J. 181 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 40.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (b), the word "commissioned" is inserted before the word "officer" for clarity. The words "member" and "members", respectively, are substituted for the words "person" and "persons".
In subsection (c), the words "A commissioned" are substituted for the word "An" for clarity. The word "commissioned" is inserted after the word "another" for clarity.
In subsection (d), the word "may" is substituted for the word "shall".
In subsection (e), the word "limits" is substituted for the words "shall be construed to limit".
In subsection (c), the words "A commissioned" are substituted for the word "An" for clarity. The word "commissioned" is inserted after the word "another" for clarity.
In subsection (d), the word "may" is substituted for the word "shall".
In subsection (e), the word "limits" is substituted for the words "shall be construed to limit".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/809.