FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter 37
Minimum service requirement for certain cyberspace occupational specialties
10 U.S.C. § 654
Title10 — Armed Forces
Chapter37 — GENERAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 654 (Minimum service requirement for certain cyberspace occupational specialties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 654.
Text
(a)Cyberspace Operations Officer.—The minimum service obligation for any member who successfully completes training in the armed forces in direct accession to the cyberspace operations officer occupational specialty of the Marine Corps shall be eight years.
(b)Service Obligation Defined.—In this section, the term "service obligation" means the period of active duty or, in the case of a member of a reserve component who completed cyberspace operations training in an active duty for training status as a member of a reserve component, the period of service in an active status in the Selected Reserve, required to be served after completion of cyberspace operations training.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawrence v. Texas
539 U.S. 558 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Thomasson v. Perry
80 F.3d 915 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Cammermeyer v. Perry
97 F.3d 1235 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Able v. United States
88 F.3d 1280 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Philips v. Perry
106 F.3d 1420 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Cain
59 M.J. 285 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2004)
Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc. v. Rumsfeld
291 F. Supp. 2d 269 (D. New Jersey, 2003)
Holmes v. California Army National Guard
124 F.3d 1126 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Johnson
61 M.J. 195 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
United States v. Dinges
55 M.J. 308 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
Meinhold v. United States Department of Defense
123 F.3d 1275 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,984, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6954, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,259 Volker Keith Meinhold v. United States Department of Defense United States Department of the Navy
123 F.3d 1275 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Nadel
48 M.J. 485 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
Richard Richenberg v. William J. Perry
(Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §509(b), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 243.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 654, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §571(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1670, related to policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–321, §2(f)(1)(A), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3516.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal
Pub. L. 111–321, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3515, repealed former section 654 of this title effective 60 days after the later of the Secretary of Defense receiving a report, which was released Nov. 30, 2010, and the President transmitting to the congressional defense committees a written certification, which was transmitted July 22, 2011.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 654, added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §571(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1670, related to policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–321, §2(f)(1)(A), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3516.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal
Pub. L. 111–321, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3515, repealed former section 654 of this title effective 60 days after the later of the Secretary of Defense receiving a report, which was released Nov. 30, 2010, and the President transmitting to the congressional defense committees a written certification, which was transmitted July 22, 2011.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/654.