Wisconsin § 324.34 Effect of prior judicial order or agreement.

Wisconsin Statutes

§ 324.34 — Effect of prior judicial order or agreement.

Wisconsin § 324.34

Ch. 324Deployed parents custody and visitation

Subch.subch. III of ch. 324 SUBCHAPTER III

JUDICIAL PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING CUSTODIAL RESPONSIBILITY DURING DEPLOYMENT

This text of Wisconsin § 324.34 (Effect of prior judicial order or agreement.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wis. Stat. § 324.34 (2026).

Text

34  In a proceeding for a grant of custodial responsibility under this subchapter, all of the following apply:
34(1) (1) A prior judicial order designating custodial responsibility in the event of deployment is binding on the court unless the circumstances meet the requirements of the law of this state other than this chapter for modifying a judicial order regarding custodial responsibility.
34(2) (2) The court shall enforce a prior written agreement between the parents for designating custodial responsibility in the event of deployment, including an agreement executed under subch. II , unless the court finds that the agreement is contrary to the best interest of the child.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

324.34 In a proceeding for a grant of custodial responsibility under this subchapter, all of the following apply:
324.34(1) (1) A prior judicial order designating custodial responsibility in the event of deployment is binding on the court unless the circumstances meet the requirements of the law of this state other than this chapter for modifying a judicial order regarding custodial responsibility.
324.34(2) (2) The court shall enforce a prior written agreement between the parents for designating custodial responsibility in the event of deployment, including an agreement executed under subch. II , unless the court finds that the agreement is contrary to the best interest of the child.