Washington Statutes
§ 34.05.558 — Judicial review of facts confined to record.
Washington § 34.05.558
This text of Washington § 34.05.558 (Judicial review of facts confined to record.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.558 (2026).
Text
Judicial review of disputed issues of fact shall be conducted by the court without a jury and must be confined to the agency record for judicial review as defined by this chapter, supplemented by additional evidence taken pursuant to this chapter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.
137 P.3d 31 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission
869 P.2d 1034 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)
Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
90 P.3d 659 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Bowers v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.
13 P.3d 1076 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Bowers v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
103 Wash. App. 587 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Jefferson County v. Seattle Yacht Club
870 P.2d 987 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1994)
Twin Bridge Marine Park, LLC v. Department of Ecology
162 Wash. 2d 825 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Twin Bridge Marine Park v. State
175 P.3d 1050 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
356 P.3d 753 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015)
Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
41 P.3d 1212 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Board
133 Wash. App. 503 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Snohomish County v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
386 P.3d 1064 (Washington Supreme Court, 2016)
Yow v. Department of Health Unlicensed Practice Program
199 P.3d 417 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
Puget Soundkeeper All. v. Dep't of Ecology
424 P.3d 1173 (Washington Supreme Court, 2018)
Okamoto v. Employment Security Department
27 P.3d 1203 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
Community Ass'n for Restoration of Environment v. Department of Ecology
205 P.3d 950 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Northwest Sportfishing Industry Ass'n v. Department of Ecology
288 P.3d 677 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
Willowbrook Farms, L.L.P. v. Department of Ecology
116 Wash. App. 392 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2003)
Lemire v. Department of Ecology
309 P.3d 395 (Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
Public Utility District No. 1 v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
137 Wash. App. 150 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)
Legislative History
[1988 c 288 s 513.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 34.05.001
Legislative intent.§ 34.05.010
Definitions.§ 34.05.050
Waiver.§ 34.05.060
Informal settlements.§ 34.05.070
Conversion of proceedings.§ 34.05.080
Variation from time limits.§ 34.05.090
Forest practices board—Emergency rules.§ 34.05.100
Respectful language.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Washington § 34.05.558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/34.05.558.