Washington Statutes

§ 29A.56.270 — Enforcement provisions—Mandamus—Appellate review.

Washington § 29A.56.270
JurisdictionWashington
Title 29AELECTIONS
Ch. 29A.56SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES ELECTIONS

This text of Washington § 29A.56.270 (Enforcement provisions—Mandamus—Appellate review.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.56.270 (2026).

Text

The superior court of the county in which the officer subject to recall resides has original jurisdiction to compel the performance of any act required of any public officer or to prevent the performance by any such officer of any act in relation to the recall not in compliance with law. The supreme court has like original jurisdiction in relation to state officers and revisory jurisdiction over the decisions of the superior courts. Any proceeding to compel or prevent the performance of any such act shall be begun within ten days from the time the cause of complaint arises, and shall be considered an emergency matter of public concern and take precedence over other cases, and be speedily heard and determined. Appellate review of a decision of any superior court shall be begun and perfecte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Recall of Lindquist
258 P.3d 9 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
52 case citations
Coalition for a New Spokane v. Dalton
156 Wash. 2d 244 (Washington Supreme Court, 2006)
15 case citations
In Re Recall of West
126 P.3d 798 (Washington Supreme Court, 2006)
14 case citations
In re the Recall Charges Against Seattle School District No. 1 Director Butler-Wall
162 Wash. 2d 501 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
12 case citations
Matter of Recall Charges Against Seattle School Dist. No. 1
173 P.3d 265 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
11 case citations
In re the Petition for the Recall of Heiberg
171 Wash. 2d 771 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
9 case citations
In Re Heiberg
257 P.3d 565 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
8 case citations
In re the Recall Charges Against Port of Seattle Commissioner Davis
164 Wash. 2d 361 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
3 case citations
In Re Recall of Davis
193 P.3d 98 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
3 case citations
In re Recall of Riddle
(Washington Supreme Court, 2017)
In re Recall of Weyrich
554 P.3d 1202 (Washington Supreme Court, 2024)

Legislative History

[2003 c 111 s 1423. Prior:1988 c 202 s 30;1984 c 170 s 10;1965 c 9 s 29.82.160; prior:1913 c 146 s 14; RRS s 5363. Formerly RCW29.82.160.]

Nearby Sections

15
§ 29A.04.010
By mail.
§ 29A.04.013
Canvassing.
§ 29A.04.019
Counting center.
§ 29A.04.025
County auditor.
§ 29A.04.031
Date of mailing.
§ 29A.04.037
Disabled voter.
§ 29A.04.043
Election.
§ 29A.04.055
Election officer.
§ 29A.04.058
Election official.
§ 29A.04.061
Elector.
§ 29A.04.067
Filing officer.
§ 29A.04.070
Future voter.
§ 29A.04.073
General election.
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington § 29A.56.270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/29A.56.270.