Utah § 76-6-414 Theft resulting in economic interruption.

Utah Statutes

§ 76-6-414 — Theft resulting in economic interruption.

Utah § 76-6-414

Title 76Utah Criminal Code

Ch. 76-6Offenses Against Property

Part 76-6-4Theft

This text of Utah § 76-6-414 (Theft resulting in economic interruption.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-414 (2026).

Text

(1)(1)(a) As used in this section:

(1)(a)(i) "Business" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.

(1)(a)(ii) "Governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.

(1)(a)(iii) "Economic interruption" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.

(1)(b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-401 apply to this section.

(2)An actor commits theft resulting in economic interruption if:

(2)(a) the actor intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently obtains or exercises unauthorized control over a business's or governmental entity's property with the intent to deprive the business or governmental entity of the property; and

(2)(b) the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the business o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) (1)(a) As used in this section:
(1)(a)(i) "Business" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.
(1)(a)(ii) "Governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.
(1)(a)(iii) "Economic interruption" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113.
(1)(b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-401 apply to this section.
(2) An actor commits theft resulting in economic interruption if:
(2)(a) the actor intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently obtains or exercises unauthorized control over a business's or governmental entity's property with the intent to deprive the business or governmental entity of the property; and
(2)(b) the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the business or governmental entity.
(3) (3)(a) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b) or (c), a violation of Subsection (2) is a class A misdemeanor.
(3)(b) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c), a violation of Subsection (2) is a third degree felony if the actor has two prior convictions for a violation of Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection (2).
(3)(c) A violation of Subsection (2) is a second degree felony if the actor has at least three prior convictions for a violation of Subsection (2) within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection (2).
(4) It is not a defense under this section that the actor did not know that the victim is a business or governmental entity.
(5) A prior conviction used for a penalty enhancement under Subsection (3)(b) or (c) is a conviction that is from a separate criminal episode than:
(5)(a) the most recent violation of Subsection (2); and
(5)(b) any other prior conviction that is used to enhance the penalty for the most recent violation of Subsection (2).
(6) The prosecuting attorney, or the grand jury if an indictment is returned, shall include notice in the information or indictment that the offense is subject to an enhancement under Subsection (3)(b) or (c).