Utah § 70A-3-311 Accord and satisfaction by use of instrument.

Utah Statutes

§ 70A-3-311 — Accord and satisfaction by use of instrument.

Utah § 70A-3-311

Title 70AUniform Commercial Code

Ch. 70A-3Uniform Commercial Code - Negotiable Instruments

Part 70A-3-3Enforcement of Instruments

This text of Utah § 70A-3-311 (Accord and satisfaction by use of instrument.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 70A-3-311 (2026).

Text

(1)If a person against whom a claim is asserted proves that that person in good faith tendered an instrument to the claimant as full satisfaction of the claim, the amount of the claim was unliquidated or subject to a bona fide dispute, and the claimant obtained payment of the instrument, the following subsections apply.

(2)Unless Subsection (3) applies, the claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that the instrument or an accompanying written communication contained a conspicuous statement to the effect that the instrument was tendered as full satisfaction of the claim.

(3)Subject to Subsection (4), a claim is not discharged under Subsection (2) if either of the following applies:

(3)(a) The claimant, if an organization, proves that:

(3)(a)(i) within

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) If a person against whom a claim is asserted proves that that person in good faith tendered an instrument to the claimant as full satisfaction of the claim, the amount of the claim was unliquidated or subject to a bona fide dispute, and the claimant obtained payment of the instrument, the following subsections apply.
(2) Unless Subsection (3) applies, the claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that the instrument or an accompanying written communication contained a conspicuous statement to the effect that the instrument was tendered as full satisfaction of the claim.
(3) Subject to Subsection (4), a claim is not discharged under Subsection (2) if either of the following applies:

(3)(a) The claimant, if an organization, proves that:
(3)(a)(i) within a reasonable time before the tender, the claimant sent a conspicuous statement to the person against whom the claim is asserted, which states that communications concerning disputed debts, including an instrument tendered as full satisfaction of a debt, are to be sent to a designated person, office, or place; and
(3)(a)(ii) the instrument or accompanying communication was not received by that designated person, office, or place.
(3)(b) The claimant, whether or not an organization, proves that within 90 days after payment of the instrument, the claimant tendered repayment of the amount of the instrument to the person against whom the claim is asserted. This Subsection (3)(b) does not apply if the claimant is an organization that sent a statement complying with Subsection (3)(a)(i).
(4) A claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that within a reasonable time before collection of the instrument was initiated, the claimant, or an agent of the claimant having direct responsibility with respect to the disputed obligation, knew that the instrument was tendered in full satisfaction of the claim.
(5) Merely writing a statement on a check which declares that a child support obligation is paid in full is not sufficient to bind the recipient who endorses the check. Child support obligations are considered owing unless paid in full or otherwise ordered by a tribunal.